13BB/100 is possible in 5/10 (LC) - Page 2

ArturiusX · #11 10-23-2005, 12:33 AM

[ QUOTE ]
13BB/100 over 4.7k can't be all variance

[/ QUOTE ]

So, are you going to start posting here and help us out or not?

yanicehand · #12 10-23-2005, 12:46 AM

[ QUOTE ]
13BB/100 over 4.7k can't be all variance

[/ QUOTE ]

No offense, but this is the fundamental error you seem to be overlooking.

Emperor · #13 10-23-2005, 12:47 AM

[ QUOTE ]
13BB/100 over 4.7k can't be all variance

[/ QUOTE ]

I bet we can all pick out longterm losers from our DB's that have won 10bb+/100 over a 5K stretch of hands...

baronzeus · #14 10-23-2005, 12:48 AM

[ QUOTE ]
13BB/100 over 4.7k can't be all variance

[/ QUOTE ]

i ran 12BB/100 for the first 5-6K hands at 10/20. trust me. it means NOTHING.

ggbman · #15 10-23-2005, 12:52 AM

I think you guys are not givng the OP enough credit, 58% W$SD is an attainable long term stat.

Seether · #16 10-23-2005, 01:01 AM

Your cool man, do you do coaching? Maybe you can help me work on my winrate. Here are my stats. I feel im almost there with a 12bb/100 winrate but maybe after you coaching I can reach your level of 13bb/100

#17 10-23-2005, 01:13 AM

[ QUOTE ]
Great sample size.

[/ QUOTE ]

#18 10-23-2005, 01:18 AM

Not quite 60 hands, but multiply the winrate by 6 if you want the effect of a full sample size.

admiralfluff · #19 10-23-2005, 01:33 AM

HA!

#20 10-23-2005, 01:51 AM

Uh, I'll be odd man out and tell you that at least your stats are decent (steal blinds more... way more).

Here's a HU for sample sizes: anything less than 50k is vague at best, anything under 20k is a complete joke.