Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes Hold'em
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 12-28-2005, 11:00 PM
7stud 7stud is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 143
Default Re: SSHE starting hands question

[ QUOTE ]
SSH was written with the B&M game in mind...

[/ QUOTE ]

In "Small Stakes Hold'em" in the section titled "Why this book" on p.2 David Sklansky writes:

[ QUOTE ]
There were two main reasons we shunned teaching how to beat smaller games...So, what happened to make us reconsider? Simply put it is poker on TV and poker on the Internet...All that needs to be said is that this poker explosion has made small games a viable way to make money. On the Internet you get to play more hands per hour. In fact, because you can play 2 or 3 games at once, you may get to play as many as five times as many hands per hour as in a live game. Plus you don't have to tip.

[/ QUOTE ]

So your statement is patently false.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 12-28-2005, 11:25 PM
Harv72b Harv72b is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 1,347
Default Re: SSHE starting hands question

[ QUOTE ]
Your statement makes me question whether you have ever read "Small Stakes Hold'em" because it is a pure fabrication.

[/ QUOTE ]

Go back and read the rest of the paragraph. Then, read the rest of the book. Then, compare the tables they describe to any online game you're likely to find above the .05/.10 level.

Whatever D.S. writes in the introduction does not change the material contained therein. I have yet to see an online table, even when I was playing .02/.04 way back when, which averaged 6-8 players to the flop. Even the "tight games" tables often do not apply to the online game at the small stakes level, which is why so many people stray from those recommendations.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 12-29-2005, 12:01 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: SSHE starting hands question

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Your statement makes me question whether you have ever read "Small Stakes Hold'em" because it is a pure fabrication.

[/ QUOTE ]

Go back and read the rest of the paragraph. Then, read the rest of the book. Then, compare the tables they describe to any online game you're likely to find above the .05/.10 level.

Whatever D.S. writes in the introduction does not change the material contained therein. I have yet to see an online table, even when I was playing .02/.04 way back when, which averaged 6-8 players to the flop. Even the "tight games" tables often do not apply to the online game at the small stakes level, which is why so many people stray from those recommendations.

[/ QUOTE ]

You responded to this [censored]-tard much nicer than I would have, Harv...
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:21 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.