DrDizzOOM

[DMBFan23]

Hey Evan,

I am inclined to agree. after all, this guy didn't think his date read OOT. HAHAHAHAHAHHA

[censored] you bitch! I'm gonna [censored] your bitch ass up! Just [censored] tell me when and where!!!!

[DMBFan23]

one star. and trust me, I know all about shitty gimmick accounts.

[Evan]

[ QUOTE ]
DrDizzOOM

[/ QUOTE ]
I banned you cause you're not funny.

[Escape]

Hm I have 500 hands on him at the 3/6 6max tables. He lost 300~ however his stats are 25/15/2. I guess this guy has some clue at least.

[imported_azalin]

I dont think DrDizzOOM is a 2+2er.. I have more than 8k hands with him (5/10) and he appears as a very small winner (150$ or so). His stats on the other hand are 38/24 with lots of overaggresive plays. He is a regular that is not good player so i would not do anything to discourage him...

[thebeyonder]

You 2+2ers are clowns. I know DrDizzOOm personally and he happens to be one of the most creative short handed players around. Just because he plays a lot of hands preflop doesn't mean he can't play.

Contrary to popular 2+2 philosophy, weak-tight play is not optimal. Loose-Agg is usually the way to go on Party, ask any good shorthanded player.

Agree with beyonder.

How many of these PokerTracker gurus would call Phil Ivey a fish after looking at his numbers?

[DMBFan23]

"Contrary to popular 2+2 philosophy, weak-tight play is not optimal"

omg you just blew my mind.

[wackjob]

Funny this topic got so much attention. LAG's can definately be winners. Calling 2+2ers weak-tight as a general statement is retarded. I crush Drdizz however & I don't think hes a serious winner over any large amount mainly because he has poor table selection. His type of play would be suited to super weak-tights IMO.. however the amount of 2+2ers hes playing suggests hes not too bright.