|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
HU: River Action
2k party games.
i have 2k he has me covered. villian has been winning more than his share of smallish pots in the 15mins we have played HU. i havent caught anything as of yet. seems pretty reasonable/TAGish, the kind of guy i dont think you have a huge edge against, but im still getting to know him. he was raising a good amount pf, with and w/o position, but not getting too out of line post flop. i complete 54o and he knocks on the button that is also the BB. flop: A [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]6 [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]8 [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]. i lead for 40, he calls real fast. turn: 2 [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] i check and he bets $125 into a $115 pot. i call. river: 3 [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] I check, he bets 350. I CR allin. im mostly interested in the river. is leading better here? what about a smaller CR? thanks, fsuplayer |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: HU: River Action
[ QUOTE ]
seems pretty reasonable/TAGish, the kind of guy i dont think you have a huge edge against. [/ QUOTE ] and [ QUOTE ] I CR allin [/ QUOTE ] = huh? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: HU: River Action
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] seems pretty reasonable/TAGish, the kind of guy i dont think you have a huge edge against. [/ QUOTE ] and [ QUOTE ] I CR allin [/ QUOTE ] = huh? [/ QUOTE ] im more likely to get called here by a thinking player than a mediocre 10-20 player, right? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: HU: River Action
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] seems pretty reasonable/TAGish, the kind of guy i dont think you have a huge edge against. [/ QUOTE ] and [ QUOTE ] I CR allin [/ QUOTE ] = huh? [/ QUOTE ] im more likely to get called here by a thinking player than a mediocre 10-20 player, right? [/ QUOTE ] I think that the villain has 45 here very often, therefore i think that you CANT be bluffing (at least not profitably), between the times that he calls w/ sets (not very often, only his higher ones), and the times when he has the nuts. A thinking player should be able to realize this and fold most of his hands. Thinking players dont go broke in limped in pots against the obvious nuts very often. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: HU: River Action
[ QUOTE ]
I think that the villain has 45 here very often, therefore i think that you CANT be bluffing (at least not profitably), between the times that he calls w/ sets (not very often, only his higher ones), and the times when he has the nuts. A thinking player should be able to realize this and fold most of his hands. Thinking players dont go broke in limped in pots against the obvious nuts very often. [/ QUOTE ] This hand was played heads-up. As in, only two hands were dealt. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: HU: River Action
[ QUOTE ]
This hand was played heads-up. As in, only two hands were dealt. [/ QUOTE ] your an idiot. To the OP; what would you do w/ 22 in villain's spot (after your river push)? What do you think most fairly solid players (as you described this one) would do? There are times when a push is ok, but early into a heads-up with a TAG, decent opponent, whom isnt tilted (and doesnt think you are) i doubt that a push is anywhere near the most profitable line. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: HU: River Action
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] seems pretty reasonable/TAGish, the kind of guy i dont think you have a huge edge against. [/ QUOTE ] and [ QUOTE ] I CR allin [/ QUOTE ] = huh? [/ QUOTE ] im more likely to get called here by a thinking player than a mediocre 10-20 player, right? [/ QUOTE ] I think that the villain has 45 here very often, therefore i think that you CANT be bluffing (at least not profitably), between the times that he calls w/ sets (not very often, only his higher ones), and the times when he has the nuts. A thinking player should be able to realize this and fold most of his hands. Thinking players dont go broke in limped in pots against the obvious nuts very often. [/ QUOTE ] personally i instacall here with A8, A6, and all sets |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: HU: River Action
[ QUOTE ]
personally i instacall here with A8, A6, and all sets [/ QUOTE ] And expect to see? |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
*RESULTS*
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] seems pretty reasonable/TAGish, the kind of guy i dont think you have a huge edge against. [/ QUOTE ] and [ QUOTE ] I CR allin [/ QUOTE ] = huh? [/ QUOTE ] im more likely to get called here by a thinking player than a mediocre 10-20 player, right? [/ QUOTE ] I think that the villain has 45 here very often, therefore i think that you CANT be bluffing (at least not profitably), between the times that he calls w/ sets (not very often, only his higher ones), and the times when he has the nuts. A thinking player should be able to realize this and fold most of his hands. Thinking players dont go broke in limped in pots against the obvious nuts very often. [/ QUOTE ] personally i instacall here with A8, A6, and all sets [/ QUOTE ] this is exactly what i was thinking as well. to those of you who wouldnt go broke with a set there, well, stick to full games bc you will get run over folding in these spots. his turn/river bet was really what lead me to CR all in as an overbet. he slightly overbet the turn, which is often a tell of strength. his river bet was also quite strong, not some 'please call me with an '8' bc I have a crappy ace' value bet. it reeked of strength. after I moved in, he thinks for almost the whole time (which now a days isnt much) and calls with A [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]K [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]. thanks for the responses. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: HU: River Action
i like it. if he has a set you're getting all his chips any way you play it. he probly doesn't raise your river lead with a 2pr hand, but he might call your c/r push with 2pr. and all-in is better than a smaller c/r; let him think you're trying to buy it with busted hearts. |
|
|