Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Mid-, High-Stakes Pot- and No-Limit Hold'em
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 08-27-2005, 03:07 PM
creedofhubris creedofhubris is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 35
Default actually, the awkward decision is here:

[ QUOTE ]
10/20 NL. Short stack has $450, the effective stack for main villain and me is $2300.

Short stack opens for $50, I call with 9[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]9[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], passive calling station surprisingly pops it to $140, short stack calls, I call.

Flop:

7[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] 9[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] T[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]

Short stack acts first and bets $150, leaving him with $150 behind (?!?!?!) I am next. I...?



[/ QUOTE ]

I call.

Villain min-raises (?!?!?!), which is just enough to put short stack allin.

Short stack calls.

Main villain has $1900 more behind.

It's $150 more to me, and any raise here by me is going to create a side pot.

I..?

(I should've ended the original post here, this is where I had trouble coming up with a good plan.)
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 08-27-2005, 03:17 PM
chuddo chuddo is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 20
Default Re: actually, the awkward decision is here:

either call, pray for a non heart/A/K, and check-raise the turn all in. he won't let an 'obvious draw' get checked through even with the dry side, so you can count on him to bet every time there.

or say "i was hoping you weren't going to do that. now we have to gamboool!" and go ahead and shove it all in there.

it depends on my image at the time. if for some reason im viewed as weak tight ill opt for the slow play.

more likely i'll have shown some stone bluffs like a jackass to guarantee me action in spots like this.

i am definitely getting it in there on the flop if the guy doesn't like me and would love to bust my ass.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 08-28-2005, 06:57 PM
mgsimpleton mgsimpleton is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 0
Default Re: actually, the awkward decision is here:

if villain is the type to min-raise to "see where he's at with AA" then your small raise back might be interpreted the same way.

if villain is the type to min-raise with AA or KK to milk you (as horrendous as that sounds on that flop) then a small raise back will enable him to get it in the middle.

with that said, given this ridiculous action, i'd raise another 300 on top... and let the stacking process begin.

(this is all assuming villain is not very good but given the flop action, that's a safe assumption, no?)
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 08-28-2005, 10:11 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: 10-20: that short stack makes betting my set awkward...

if you are positive hes got AA or KK i would just call the 150, hoping that he would raise, then i think re raising enuf get both of you pot stuck no matter what the turn card is. i think the main reason why is because you dont want him to fold incase the turn card is a heart, 6 8 or J, putting scare cards out there that he could lay down his AA or KK much easier.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 08-29-2005, 01:30 PM
HoldEmKillah HoldEmKillah is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 11
Default Re: 10-20: that short stack makes betting my set awkward...

I would min-raise, putting the short stack exactly all in. This looks like you are trying to isolate the short stack and don't want Villian coming along...could also be viewed as an 'info raise.' Playing it this way makes it look like JJ/QQ/A10, overs w/hearts or JQ. When he re-raises, come back OOT for enough to make him play for his stack but don't push unless his rr is large enough.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 08-29-2005, 02:51 PM
creedofhubris creedofhubris is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 35
Default results, thank god he was a moron

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
10/20 NL. Short stack has $450, the effective stack for main villain and me is $2300.

Short stack opens for $50, I call with 9[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]9[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], passive calling station surprisingly pops it to $140, short stack calls, I call.

Flop:

7[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] 9[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] T[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]

Short stack acts first and bets $150, leaving him with $150 behind (?!?!?!) I am next. I...?



[/ QUOTE ]

I call.

Villain min-raises (?!?!?!), which is just enough to put short stack allin.

Short stack calls.

Main villain has $1900 more behind.

It's $150 more to me, and any raise here by me is going to create a side pot.

I..?

(I should've ended the original post here, this is where I had trouble coming up with a good plan.)

[/ QUOTE ]

OK, I made it $750 more to go. My logic here was that, given the minraise and the too-small preflop reraise, villlain obviously sucked ass, so he would call a moderate raise, but allin was too much of an overbet and he might escape. I also decided I wanted to be allin on the turn with this hand, since a bunch of scare cards might come.

The turn was 5[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], I pushed, he called.

River was 3[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], putting 4 hearts on the board! Short stack tabled J[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]K[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] and big stack tabled A[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]A[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] and MHIG. I was very glad the money was in on the turn.

I think the problem was that given the draw-heavy board, I needed to get the money in quick before scare cards hit, and the small bets on the flop just weren't helping me do that, so that I had to give the game away with a big flop bomb which a stronger opponent could've folded to.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 08-29-2005, 05:33 PM
mgsimpleton mgsimpleton is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 0
Default Re: results, thank god he was a moron

nice hand. i think the key to this is knowing they have AA and are minraising sort of puts some assumptions in your head about them "sucking ass" and then you can play appropriately...

i've been thinking about this a lot in situations where you raise big with some hand like TPTK because you put the opponent on either bottom two playig the way it was supposed to be played or top pair played by a donk... you raise big because you think a good player might fold bottom two given the action and a donk who played a worse hand like this would call anyway. so when people have given advice saying "maybe xxx would fold" and someone else chimes in, "how can you say you want worse hands to call but better hands to fold???" it comes down to the way the hand was played out, it is a better hand by a good player or a worse hand by a donk and your raise is perfect in both situations.

that was kind of convoluted, i think i'm going to come up with a more concrete example, but i think it comes down to using previous information in a hand to decide how to proceed which is something i don't see quite enough of.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:50 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.