Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes Hold'em

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-20-2005, 12:13 PM
Yads Yads is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 412
Default KQs, this is just awful PF

My first foray into 3/6 and I'm playing scared poker. CO was a 66/20 after 15 hands. Can a case even be made for cold calling here?

Party Poker 3/6 Hold'em (8 handed) converter

Preflop: Hero is Button with Q[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], K[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img].
<font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, UTG+1 calls, <font color="#666666">2 folds</font>, <font color="#CC3333">CO raises</font>, Hero calls
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-20-2005, 12:17 PM
LImitPlayer LImitPlayer is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 162
Default Re: KQs, this is just awful PF

I would 3 bet and hope UTG1 folds preflop
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-20-2005, 12:18 PM
Rico Suave Rico Suave is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 480
Default Re: KQs, this is just awful PF

Yads

[ QUOTE ]
Can a case even be made for cold calling here?


[/ QUOTE ]

Yes

--Rico
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-20-2005, 12:19 PM
Perseus Perseus is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 264
Default Re: KQs, this is just awful PF

With position against this raiser, and even though it's only been 15 hands you know he's not a tight player, I raise this PF...

...you want to try to isolate him heads up
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-20-2005, 12:24 PM
DMBFan23 DMBFan23 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: I don\'t want a large Farva
Posts: 417
Default Re: KQs, this is just awful PF

I think you have a definite edge against the limper, the question is how do you fare against the raiser. 20 hands is basically no read, but you will be ahead of all but the rockiest player's range here.

3 betting will probably not fold out the limper unless he is a good player (this would not be a bad result, if he is good) but having initiative plus exploiting your likely edge is a good enough reason for me to three bet.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-20-2005, 12:28 PM
MRBAA MRBAA is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: New York City \'burbs
Posts: 893
Default Re: KQs, this is just awful PF

I'd just call here as well. Your hand isn't strong enough to reraise for value, you may well not knock out the limper (and probably want him in if you hit anyway) and could get four bet by the cutoff.

I call with position and look to get a piece of the flop. Getting about 6.5-1 if the cutoff bets the flop, I'm prepared to fold if I flat out miss raise with a piece or a flush draw.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-20-2005, 12:30 PM
DMBFan23 DMBFan23 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: I don\'t want a large Farva
Posts: 417
Default Re: KQs, this is just awful PF

this also depends on the BB IMO, if he is loose I think there is more merit to calling, if he is tight/solid I think a three bet becomes more mandatory
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-20-2005, 12:32 PM
Luke Luke is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 361
Default Re: KQs, this is just awful PF

You only have 15 hands so you can't say too much about the guy but I think you know he's loose and possibly aggressive.

If you had a stronger read (more hands) and he was still raising 20% of the time, you should 3-bet there in a heartbeat.

But without the more reliable data, I'd just call as I still think your hand and position are strong enough to at least take a flop.

Luke
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-20-2005, 12:39 PM
coolhanded coolhanded is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 0
Default Re: KQs, this is just awful PF

Tough call, but I say call. By the numbers, heads up you are a slight dog (~54/46) to any pocket pair below QQ, and any non-suited Ax with kicker below a Q. With this hand in this situation, I'll take the limper (and the BB if possible) in versus being heads up with the CO. Despite CO's LAGgy PT stats, his raise indicates he should have something decent here with an UTG caller, so I don't think I want him heads up. If he's the type that is aggressive early and then lays 'em down a lot before a showdown, I'd consider 3-betting.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-20-2005, 01:35 PM
Yads Yads is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 412
Default Re: KQs, this is just awful PF

[ QUOTE ]
You only have 15 hands so you can't say too much about the guy but I think you know he's loose and possibly aggressive.

If you had a stronger read (more hands) and he was still raising 20% of the time, you should 3-bet there in a heartbeat.

But without the more reliable data, I'd just call as I still think your hand and position are strong enough to at least take a flop.

Luke

[/ QUOTE ]

This was my thinking at the time. He could have easily just been on a good run of cards (he wasn't showing down any hands since people would just fold to his aggression.) I figured I had position and a pretty decent hand to at least see what the flop brought. Well at least it wasn't a total donk play.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:31 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.