Heres one for Sklansky

[Noo Yawk]

I'm sitting here waiting for the cable guy to come after they screwed up installing our cable last week. So they tell me, once again, they'll be here between 10-2.

If any of these people were on fire, I wouldn't cross the street to pee on them.

Is this an act of omission or commision?

Damn lack of competition.

[chezlaw]

It's an act of tilt

[Gallopin Gael]

That's easy.

The HORSE'S name is Thursday.

[Mayhap]

Are you drinking enough water?
Hydration is important.
/M

[RydenStoompala]

You have omitted determining which cable person messed up the work order so you will commit a mistaken vendetta by failing to pee on any person associated with the company, when they are on fire.

If you know which one messed up, then pee on the others and let him/her burn, then it's retribution and murder. So it's lose-lose for you and highly likely that even if you chose to urinate on them, the fire would still kill them.

However, if you did not have to pee,and peeing was the only possible way to extinguish the blaze, then you would not be guilty of anything other than participation in an unlikely event. You would also be living in Buffalo.

[Poker21]

Omission if you didn't set him on fire.