|
|
#91
12-16-2005, 07:36 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: GIGABET.
[ QUOTE ]
Why did you move all in on the river, since you know you could only be called by a better hand? [/ QUOTE ] I really don't think he'd mind if the villain folded since he has about 0 chance to have the best hand. 
|
|
#93
12-18-2005, 10:53 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: GIGABET.
[ QUOTE ]
Umm, I never called Gigabet an idiot. Degen is the idiot. And if Antonius made anything close to a standard sized reraise, calling with 75off to see a flop was a poor play. The only way I could see it not being a poor play was if Antonius made the minimum reraise, and even then it's iffy. [/ QUOTE ] Agreed.
|
|
#94
12-18-2005, 11:15 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: GIGABET.
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Umm, I never called Gigabet an idiot. Degen is the idiot. And if Antonius made anything close to a standard sized reraise, calling with 75off to see a flop was a poor play. The only way I could see it not being a poor play was if Antonius made the minimum reraise, and even then it's iffy. [/ QUOTE ] Agreed. [/ QUOTE ] wait a second, you guys are folding to a minraise preflop? I think that's poor for metagame reasons (especially with rising blinds and stuck playing against the same people this late)
|
|
#95
12-19-2005, 12:41 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: I can officially say...
[ QUOTE ]
...reading Gigabet's post re-affirms why I love poker...and why I'm still in the small stakes games. That's Ph.D-level thinking. [/ QUOTE ] If you have a PhD in creationism maybe.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
