|
|
#1
09-30-2005, 04:58 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Bankroll size for $20 single tables
Hello-
I have been beating $10 plus $1 single table tourneys for about 6 months now. Keeping my bankroll around $450. What is a great bankroll for $20 plus $2 player? and is there much difference in the difficulty from 10 to 20? Thanks 
|
|
#3
09-30-2005, 05:05 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Bankroll size for $20 single tables
Not much skill difference between 22s and 11s. I would say 10000000000 dollars would be a great bankroll, but I guess a good bankroll would be whatever you are comfortable playing with, accepting the risk of ruin of a really bad stretch of cards. I'd say you can move up with 450, but if you start to run bad, say drop 8 buyins, I would move back down to the 11s. I think one of the biggest leaks in a lot of poker players is ego and not recognizing when they have to small of a roll to play a game, even though in the long run they will beat that game. Moving back down after you have been at a higher level for a while is tough to do, but self-discipline is a necessary tool for any poker pro.
|
|
#4
09-30-2005, 05:08 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Bankroll size for $20 single tables
I believe 30-50 buy-in's at any level is a good measure. This is of based on individual comfort though. (your crushing the $10's and have a BR of $450? -- hmmmmm, might want to play more $10's). I think the play on 20's is easier, but I am sure I'm in the minority there.
|
|
#5
09-30-2005, 05:09 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Bankroll size for $20 single tables
I play the 33s with 100 buyins so that I may enjoy swings such as my -34 buyin swing this past month with carefree abandon, knowing that I don't have to move down because I run not g00t. Yay!
Umm yeah, you don't need $2200 to play the 22s though. Read the FAQ.
|
|
#8
09-30-2005, 06:23 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Bankroll size for $20 single tables
I'm going to be the first to say that I find the $22s much harder than the $11s. My sample size in both isn't big enough for you guys to believe me, so I'll stop here.
|
|
#10
09-30-2005, 09:04 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Bankroll size for $20 single tables
Highjack
[ QUOTE ] I'm going to be the first to say that I find the $22s much harder than the $11s. My sample size in both isn't big enough for you guys to believe me, so I'll stop here. [/ QUOTE ] You could start convincing us first by showing some hand histories that demonstrate there are some good players making good plays (or at least better then 11's) in the 22's.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
