|
|
|
|
#1
12-23-2005, 06:41 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Turn Decision
Well, obviously you called down and weren't happy about the result. Without a spectacular read that this person is 100% ABC, I'd be calling down as well and hoping to find AT, 2 diamonds, or to catch a 5-outer against his 2 pair.
|
|
#2
12-23-2005, 06:54 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Turn Decision
[ QUOTE ]
Well, obviously you called down and weren't happy about the result. Without a spectacular read that this person is 100% ABC, I'd be calling down as well and hoping to find AT, 2 diamonds, or to catch a 5-outer against his 2 pair. [/ QUOTE ] becasue he mised the turn 3-bet for value. but with his vpip i can just call down
|
|
#3
12-23-2005, 06:54 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Turn Decision
[ QUOTE ]
Well, obviously you called down and weren't happy about the result. Without a spectacular read that this person is 100% ABC, I'd be calling down as well and hoping to find AT, 2 diamonds, or to catch a 5-outer against his 2 pair. [/ QUOTE ] Yes, I called down, and yes, he did have a set. But that's not really my point. When he check-raised the turn I remember thinking three things: 1) I don't think he's loose enough to have two pair 2) I don't think he's tricky/aggressive enough to be making a move with top pair (or a flush draw) 3) Folding feels really weak Roughly once or twice a day I find myself in situations like this, where I have thought-out reasons for folding but "don't want to be weak-tight". As a 13/7 player, I'm very (overly?) conscious of playing weak-tight, so I end up calling down more often than not. Obviously, I don't want to make it a habit of being results-oriented when the "results" are as short-term as who won a specific hand, but the overwhelming majority of the time my thoughts are accurate. That is, the villain ends up being within the range of hands I put him on. Historically, hand reading has not been one of my strengths, but I seem to be improving and am unsure how far to trust these instincts. Scott
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
