#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A run of cards and your adjustments...
I would probably call...and he is mad he didn't call as a huge underdog so that he could suckout a runner runner straight so I wouldn't put him on the 4 hards that have you beat...and if he did then I wuold say "damn...I knew you had that had but I was counting on winning with a runner runner straight".
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A run of cards and your adjustments...
That's true about the JJ lying, but I wouldn't completely discount it, because he did call the initial raise, and fold to your isolation re-raise, so it also "looks" like he had JJ.
[ QUOTE ] Easy call if he has AK. I'm 60/40 to win and getting better than 1:1. If I lose, I still have a stack. [/ QUOTE ] 2 high cards or an underpair will be what he flips most of the time here. So call. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A run of cards and your adjustments...
I'll post the pretty irrelevent though somewhat surprising results tonight. I'd like to get a few more responses before then as to what my thinking should be.
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A run of cards and your adjustments...
[ QUOTE ]
What if he wants it to look like he's on tilt/bluffing so that I call and he actually has a high PP? [/ QUOTE ] I love this play as the villain, and use it whenever I can. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A run of cards and your adjustments...
Oh yeah, villian had queens and MHING.
guess I gotta remember that for next time. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A run of cards and your adjustments...
Villain is complaining that he folded JJ last hand and would have made a str8 to win pot, so let's put him on semi-Tilt for missing a big opportunity with a decent hand.
While he might want to play back at you with 77 or 88, I think it’s more likely you’re looking at 2 over cards for your best case and an over pair at worse. I’d drop it here. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A run of cards and your adjustments...
Jack21, I have had those thoughts so many times. "why would you do that? It makes no rational sense." I agree with many of the thoughts posted in this thread. I just can't see him playing AA/KK this way. While QQ and JJ are possible, they are still less likely to be played this way than AJ/KQ/etc. I think that villian's range lens much more heavily towards hands that are slighlty behind. Let us not discount 55-99 too. I think that this is a "thoughtful" call. That is, when you do the math and think about how villian would "likely" play hands, this is a call.
CSC |
|
|