I limp-reraise.

[Munga30]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
stays the same or goes down slightly with the all-in player

[/ QUOTE ]

That makes no sense. He's not less likely to fold because of the all-in player. Generally, he's more likely to fold. That's what protected pots are all about.

[/ QUOTE ]

Didn't you say earlier that you figure to have the all-in beat with your 88? If you can see that the all-in isn't likely to have much, why can't MP2? How does *this* all-in opponent protect *this* pot?

[S_Perry]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
stays the same or goes down slightly with the all-in player

[/ QUOTE ]

That makes no sense. He's not less likely to fold because of the all-in player. Generally, he's more likely to fold. That's what protected pots are all about.

[/ QUOTE ]

Didn't you say earlier that you figure to have the all-in beat with your 88? If you can see that the all-in isn't likely to have much, why can't MP2? How does *this* all-in opponent protect *this* pot?

[/ QUOTE ]

MP2 can try that by raising the flop or by 4-betting preflop and certainly that's a danger. But someone has clearly represented a monster and the pot is protected. It's not the best time to make a move with very little. He is likely showdown committed if he plays back aggressively and Entity can safely release his hand.