Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > General Gambling > Rake Back
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-28-2005, 05:20 PM
Asufiji2004 Asufiji2004 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 49
Default Is RB worth it for a small stakes player?

Sorry total noob when it comes to this, but I was wondering if it's worth it for me. I play maybe 15-20 hrs a week. Mostly .50/1 or 1-2 limit, some NL and small buy-in tournies. This is a hobby, but free $$ is free $$. Should I stick to bonus whoring or is setting up rakeback at a site, a good option for me? Any ideas as to the best site for a player like me?

Thanx..sorry for the noob questions.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-28-2005, 05:31 PM
rhizome rhizome is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 5
Default Re: Is RB worth it for a small stakes player?

Hmmm.... If I sign up with rakeback, then I get X% of my rake paid back to me. If I sign up without rakeback, then I get 0% of my rake paid back to me. Unless X < 0, or you hate money, getting rakeback is the better option. Obviously.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-28-2005, 05:37 PM
Asufiji2004 Asufiji2004 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 49
Default Re: Is RB worth it for a small stakes player?

Well if bonuses are deducted...ah whatever I must be missing something. I didn't realize it was so cut and dry. Like I said i'm a noob at this. Obviously I will get on it then.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-28-2005, 05:41 PM
JohnnyHumongous JohnnyHumongous is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 382
Default Re: Is RB worth it for a small stakes player?

Bonuses are deducted from your MGR, meaning that you won't get any rakeback until you have generated exactly as much rake as you have received in bonus. After that you start getting rakeback. So, that means that the bonus is effectively 100% rakeback and once it is paid you go down to receiving 25% rakeback.

The deduction of bonuses is so the poker site is never actually paying an effective 125% of your rake back to you. But as the poster above pointed out, it is effectively a can't-lose proposition.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-28-2005, 05:51 PM
Felipe Felipe is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 85
Default Re: Is RB worth it for a small stakes player?

if you're already a player at a site, can i just create a "new" account and sign up for rakeback? will they notice?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-28-2005, 06:13 PM
Asufiji2004 Asufiji2004 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 49
Default Re: Is RB worth it for a small stakes player?

Thanx that was help-ful. I get you're point, it's a no lose situation even if I don't generate much. I already have party/full-tilt/empire accounts. Is absolute a good choice?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-28-2005, 06:16 PM
Pokeraddict Pokeraddict is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 91
Default Re: Is RB worth it for a small stakes player?

[ QUOTE ]
Thanx that was help-ful. I get you're point, it's a no lose situation even if I don't generate much. I already have party/full-tilt/empire accounts. Is absolute a good choice?

[/ QUOTE ]

Yes Absolute is a great choice, they dont even deduct your bonuses from your rakeback.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-28-2005, 10:04 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Is RB worth it for a small stakes player?

Yes they will notice so no you can't just create a new account by signing up through an affiliate.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-29-2005, 01:50 AM
iMcompliKted iMcompliKted is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 3
Default Re: Is RB worth it for a small stakes player?

One thing to keep in mind is that if you are just hitting bonuses your MGR can be negative especially with all the large competitive bonus offers out there. This would mean an affiliate and the casino would take a loss on you. Empire has been known to shut player's accounts down because of this and you are likely to piss off whatever affiliate ends up providing you this charity service unless you work out something with them before you sign up. This is presuming you just hit bonuses and run, in which case I don't think rakeback is the best option. However, you don't want to be stuck on an account without rakeback in the event you did start playing a lot after you hit your bonuses.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-29-2005, 02:01 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Is RB worth it for a small stakes player?

I would never advise a player to sign up without rakeback ever. A player with a good rakeback deal from a reliable affiliate will always be better off than the same player without rakeback. Todays $.50/1.00 bonus whore with a negative monthly mgr could be multitabling 5/10 or higher in six months to a year. If I was that player I would hate to be without a rakeback deal. It's never a bad idea to sign up for rakeback. From a player's perspective it can only be +EV.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:48 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.