Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > General Gambling > Probability
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 07-22-2005, 08:55 AM
LetYouDown LetYouDown is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sharing a smoke w/negativity
Posts: 524
Default Re: Set over Set

For this problem, you're looking for the total number of boards that contain your criteria divided by the total number of possible boards. Order is irrelevant for a flop.

[C(2,1) * C(2,1) * C(46,1)]/C(48,3) = 1.06% = 93 to 1

The C(2,1) is the # of ways to choose one of the remaining cards of the pocket pair you hold. There's 2 cards left, so obviously two of them can appear and meet that criteria. The second C(2,1) is the same thing for the other pair. You now know 6 cards (4 in player's hands, 2 on board)...so there's C(46,1) cards left in the deck. So there's C(2,1) * C(2,1) * C(46,1) ways the board can come for two players with pairs to flop a set and/or quads. There are C(48,3) total ways the board can come.

HTH
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 07-22-2005, 11:31 AM
bluewilde bluewilde is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: DC
Posts: 372
Default Re: Set over Set

I'm not sure if your guys' calculations answer this, but what is the chance for set over set for "n" random hands. That is, in an n-handed game, what are the chances two different players with random hand flop a set from a PP. I'm trying to take into account the chance that they're both dealt pocket pairs and they both hit sets, I was under the impression that the 93-1 was for two guys with PPs both hitting sets, that it doesn't take into account the chance these guys will both be dealt PPs in the first place.

I only ask because I saw this 3 times in a home game the other week, and I was pretty sure that the chances of this were very very remote. It was in a set of about 250 hands, so I wonder if I should suspect cheating (I would never play in a game with people I didn't trust, but if the numbers are convincing I'd have to reconsider my group). Like the time one of these guys insisted he'd gone 9 hands without a card over 7, and I estimated the chances of that at (24/52*23/51)^9. Is that right? Either way, I doubted the occurence.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 07-22-2005, 06:53 PM
PauliF PauliF is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 1
Default Re: Set over Set

thanks let you down
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 07-25-2005, 12:44 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Set over Set

[ QUOTE ]
Another time I flopped quads, another turned quads, and a third guy rivered a royal.

[/ QUOTE ]
How does the betting go when there are two quads on the turn such that the third guy has even the slightest reason to stay in the hand for the river?
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 07-27-2005, 01:38 AM
Jimmy The Fish Jimmy The Fish is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Adjusting to Hoosierhood
Posts: 52
Default Re: Set over Set

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Another time I flopped quads, another turned quads, and a third guy rivered a royal.

[/ QUOTE ]
How does the betting go when there are two quads on the turn such that the third guy has even the slightest reason to stay in the hand for the river?

[/ QUOTE ]

All-in, either preflop or on the flop. If he held KsQs, and JsTsTd flopped, and he was short-stacked...

[img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:53 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.