Is there any beat worse than this one?

[Biggenx]

what..... could it be...... yet another troll post?!?!

i don't think one bad beat is going to hurt my $1700 bankroll, moron..

go troll someplace else, what the hell is your problem, get a life

[BZ_Zorro]

lol

[Rode_Dog]

I put him all-in at the flop. He called with a 3 str8 and hit runner-runner.

[DeepFryer]

[ QUOTE ]
what..... could it be...... yet another troll post?!?!

i don't think one bad beat is going to hurt my $1700 bankroll, moron..

go troll someplace else, what the hell is your problem, get a life

[/ QUOTE ]

Alright, buddy, you're the one being the troll now. People have already posted beats that were more mathematically improbable than yours, as well as beats where the opponent played less skillfully than your opponent did. In other words, they were worse beats.

891-1 is much worse than 47-1 (or whatever it was). And, calling an all-in bet with 1 out is much worse than making an all-in bluff with 1 out.

So I think people are just getting irritated because you won't simply accept these facts and move on.

[Biggenx]

you're right, i guess i was being to picky. But there were quit a few posts that weren't even close to mine yet claimed to be worse. i still think mine is the ugliest bad beat, only because the punk used one of his lousy cards to claim the quaded board.

but you're right, runner runner one outers is much worse.

[Tilt]

I beat a straight flush with a runner-runner royal once, and we were deep. I posted it here, too. That was awesome. Next time you get a bad beat, just remember that time you laid a bad beat on someone else.

[Matt Ruff]

[ QUOTE ]
Hero raises $3

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't know what the worst bad beat ever was, but I'm pretty sure it didn't happen at the $.50/$1 tables.

-- M. Ruff

[Jocke_F]

999 of 1000 ? more like 49 of 50 [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]