Anyone move up from 1/2 to 3/6 6max at PP?

[Digs]

Yall are making me want to make the jump prematurely. [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img]

<goes back to grinding out 1/2>

[brian94709]

I recently moved from 1/2 SH to 3/6SH.
I found the 1/2 games to be unbelievably soft. The 3/6 games are harder certainly, with more aggressive players, and less totally insanely bad players.

But still the 3/6 games are pretty damn soft. More so than I expected.

[thuja]

I just made the same jump as everyone else to 3/6 6-max.
What I've found is that these table are a lot more aggressive. There still seems to be one or two loose agressives at every table. And there are more tight players at the table. The main difference I see between the two levels is almost a complete lack of loose passive fish at 3/6.

What's worked very well for me at 3/6 is playing textbook Miller's SSHE.

Personally I found at 1/2 6-max that the SSHE strategy was sub-optimal due to 4-5 fish at every table creating a never ending stream of amazing suckouts. I found at 1/2 I could make more money with a tight/passive/aggressive strategy due to the large number of fish.

[ckessel]

[ QUOTE ]
A couple thousand hands is nothing. I crushed 5/10 sh for 3000 hands before it finally fought back. I really think 3/6 is almost the same as 1/2 skill wise, which is not much different than 5/10.

[/ QUOTE ]

It's about 5k hands, but point taken. Still, at 1/2 I can "table captain" for the most part, driving the action. At 3/6 I get played back at a lot more, forced into tough decisions. 1/2 was auto-pilot.