|
|
#11
08-21-2005, 05:51 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Why do some sites have much better players than others?
While I would agree that Stars's ring games are not as soft as Party, the games have gotten considerably softer since their player base has grown. Stars TV ads have increased since Raymer gave them a two-peat in the WSOP, especially in 2005. I believe those ads have had an effect in bringing in more fishy players. I don't think it is a coincidence.
|
|
#12
08-21-2005, 08:55 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Why do some sites have much better players than others?
I've never played there, but theoretically, PokerRoom should have the worst players since they get all the idiots who insist on using Macs.
|
|
#13
08-21-2005, 09:01 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Why do some sites have much better players than others?
[ QUOTE ]
Also a link from a sportsbook helps a ton [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] And a casino. but sportsbook maybe moreso. 2nd
|
|
#14
08-21-2005, 09:55 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Why do some sites have much better players than others?
[ QUOTE ]
I've never played there, but theoretically, PokerRoom should have the worst players since they get all the idiots who insist on using Macs. [/ QUOTE ] This used to be true, but then skins started offering good rakeback and bonus programs. The small site just got a lot of 2+2'ers added to it.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
