Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Internet Gambling > Internet Gambling
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 10-09-2005, 04:43 PM
kenberman kenberman is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 1
Default Re: Monday opening bid for PRTY.L : 40?.

[ QUOTE ]
Sudden 40 % decrease of players in Party Network does not please investors I think.

[/ QUOTE ]

lol
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 10-09-2005, 04:46 PM
jrobb83 jrobb83 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Tempe, AZ
Posts: 83
Default Re: Monday opening bid for PRTY.L : 40?.

[ QUOTE ]

Then there's the small matter of the massive lawsuits by all the skins.

[/ QUOTE ]

If Party knew they were opening themselves up to massive lawsuits by all the skins, do you really think they would have done this?
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 10-09-2005, 04:49 PM
lu_hawk lu_hawk is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 6
Default Re: Monday opening bid for PRTY.L : 40?.

I don't see how this is necessarily bad for party, you can think up many scenarios where it turns out to be good in the long run. Empire on the other hand will be crushed tomorrow.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 10-09-2005, 05:28 PM
Luv2DriveTT Luv2DriveTT is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 3
Default Re: Monday opening bid for PRTY.L : 40?.

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

Then there's the small matter of the massive lawsuits by all the skins.

[/ QUOTE ]

If Party knew they were opening themselves up to massive lawsuits by all the skins, do you really think they would have done this?

[/ QUOTE ]

Absolutely. This is a part of their corporate strategy, and I have to say its brilliant. I would think its safe to assume that each skin's contract is to be on the "IGM Network Shared Platform". I doubt there is anything within the contracts that state that Party must remain on the shared platform as well. This will signal handedly force one for the following to occur:

1) Skins to be forced to submit to a takeover (ala Poker Now)

2) Skins to sell user base to Party

3) Skins to leave the Party network altogether, while watching their user base jump ship to join Party

This really is a win-win for Party, they just lowered the cost of acquisition greatly for themselves. Of course temporarily their user base will become smaller, but they made significantly less off the skins than they did from their primary user base anyway.

TT [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 10-09-2005, 08:36 PM
Shoe Shoe is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Mil-town
Posts: 98
Default Re: Monday opening bid for PRTY.L : 40?.

I don't see this changing party's price much... but shouldn't we be shorting empire? what is their ticker again?
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 10-09-2005, 08:48 PM
A_PLUS A_PLUS is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 44
Default Re: Monday opening bid for PRTY.L : 40?.

[ QUOTE ]
Well man, you're a little off on this one, first off it's going to take a while for the LSE to realize that there has been this big of drop off in players. Also pp can do some interesting reporting so no one except the serious investor/player will know what's really going on. Second shareholders/stock price is based on the P/E ratio, not how many players play on it (for the long term). For the short term stock prices are largely based on supply/demand. PP stocks will be more affected by the addition of blackjack then by the breaking up of skins. For your information if you do not currently know the P/E ratio and don't know what a usual gaming stock trades on the LSE DO NOT TRADE YOUR OWN STOCKS, buy mutual funds for the love of GOD!!!!!


discliamer:

(I used to daytrade stocks for a living, but DO NOT PM me for advice on stock trading, if I don't know you, I won't give you advice)

[/ QUOTE ]

Party sends out a press release, analysts read it, they do a quick check, see the drop in players, pass along the info. It is already known by people that follow the stock.

I have no idea if it will be viewed as a positive or negative. I dont really know how this affects their current and long term profitability. But lets not pretend P/E is the only driver of stock price please. If it were that easy, we would all be rich.

But I couldnt agree more with this

Buy MUTUAL FUNDS unless you have a lot of experience in the financial markets.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 10-09-2005, 08:49 PM
cardcounter0 cardcounter0 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 1,370
Default Re: Monday opening bid for PRTY.L : 40?.

[ QUOTE ]
Second shareholders/stock price is based on the P/E ratio

[/ QUOTE ]

Don't worry, I think I will pass on any stock advice from you.
[img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 10-09-2005, 08:51 PM
Jeff W Jeff W is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 85
Default Re: Monday opening bid for PRTY.L : 40?.

[ QUOTE ]
If Party knew they were opening themselves up to massive lawsuits by all the skins, do you really think they would have done this?

[/ QUOTE ]

Regardless of whether what they did is legal or illegal, they can still be sued and that brings bad pub.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 10-09-2005, 08:52 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Monday opening bid for PRTY.L : 40?.

in my opinion, it's gonna tank. i expect about a 15 point drop.

info moves fast.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 10-09-2005, 08:56 PM
Cubswin Cubswin is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 1,079
Default Re: Monday opening bid for PRTY.L : 40?.

[ QUOTE ]
Don't worry, I think I will pass on any stock advice from you.

[/ QUOTE ]
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:37 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.