Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Mid- and High-Stakes Hold'em
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 09-07-2005, 10:48 AM
rmarotti rmarotti is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Hibernating
Posts: 36
Default Re: 20-40 Party, 5-handed KQs

Bump for more thoughts. Everyone agree with stox?
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 09-07-2005, 10:57 AM
rmarotti rmarotti is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Hibernating
Posts: 36
Default Re: 20-40 Party, 5-handed KQs

No.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 09-07-2005, 11:25 AM
La Brujita La Brujita is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 517
Default Re: 20-40 Party, 5-handed KQs

I don't normally play this the way stox does but to tell the truth, when he plays something differently from me I get very nervous.

I mostly bet this turn thinking:

1. want to make him pay to draw for flush

2. the ace might scare him as much as me

3. he might have a wide range of open raising hands that include many gutshot combos

My problem is I don't know well how to deal with turn raises because you see so many turn semibluff raises I get stuck calling down a decent amount.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 09-07-2005, 12:18 PM
stoxtrader stoxtrader is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 219
Default Re: 20-40 Party, 5-handed KQs

I'm wondering if people dont find this thread interesting OR some just don't have a strong opinion on what is correct. I like my turn check but would love to hear other poster's thoughts.

Obviously if villain is on a flush draw a turn bet is correct, but otherwise I think a turn check is right. net/net I like the check.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 09-07-2005, 01:53 PM
arkady arkady is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Home of the Red Sox
Posts: 195
Default Re: 20-40 Party, 5-handed KQs

This thread belongs in HUSH, but whatever...

stox is dead on imo, someone keen enough to be 3-betting 66 on the turn with overs might just be keen enough to raise KQ/JJ when that A hits after you get 'scared'. You don't want to get pushed off this hand and he might be aggro nuf to bet his queens/other PP for you.

The question is does he value bet a non ace on the river? I would guess that leading any club/q/k might be a good idea on the river as he will pay off with a worse hand. But I dunno, i probably wimp out and check/call again.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 09-07-2005, 02:09 PM
bicyclekick bicyclekick is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Morris, MN
Posts: 416
Default Re: 20-40 Party, 5-handed KQs

I typically check there. Against players who love to bluff raise the turn with aces on board I might actually be more apt to bet because maybe they'll go off for 2-3 more bb in a pot they're way behind. A lot of times they're also the type that will just call when they actually hit that ace so if they call the turn i'll def not bet the river. Probably check call.

Oh and I'm calling this down like every time.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 09-07-2005, 02:10 PM
Michael Davis Michael Davis is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Santa Monica, CA
Posts: 613
Default Re: 20-40 Party, 5-handed KQs

What do you do on the river if the turn goes check-check?

-Michael
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 09-07-2005, 02:23 PM
bicyclekick bicyclekick is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Morris, MN
Posts: 416
Default Re: 20-40 Party, 5-handed KQs

[ QUOTE ]
What do you do on the river if the turn goes check-check?

-Michael

[/ QUOTE ]

bet or check-raise.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 09-07-2005, 02:27 PM
Michael Davis Michael Davis is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Santa Monica, CA
Posts: 613
Default Re: 20-40 Party, 5-handed KQs

Okay well I feel better after this series of posts.

In the actual hand I checked. He checked behind. I checked the river intending to checkraise.

Had he bet the turn I was calling down both streets, but I don't know if this is correct. I would have checked to him on the river no matter what hits, even if the flush card hits I think I lose money betting out the river (after a turn bet), I really think trying to induce another bluff is the only way to salvage anything.

-Michael
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 09-07-2005, 03:40 PM
Gabe Gabe is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 680
Default Re: 20-40 Party, 5-handed KQs

textbook check.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:51 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.