Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Mid-, High-Stakes Pot- and No-Limit Hold'em
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-15-2004, 12:58 AM
Louie Landale Louie Landale is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,277
Default Re: Big semi-bluff vs. known overpair

I can say without hesitation that bluffing this sort of player is a LOT more profitable than getting him to call when you've got near the nuts and he's got the real goods. That situation doesn't come up very often, but villian with an overpair when there is some hint of a scare card is VERY common. You'll get to bluff a fair number of small pots and 5-6 big pots before you get him to commit a bunch of chips drawing slim.

"consistent" isn't the same thing as "same", it means "appropriate for". If you artificially discourage a bet (say by threatening with chips), then its inconsistent to call. I see that a lot: folks "check blind" on the river with a drawing hand. Why discourage a bet then?

- Louie
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:56 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.