Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Micro-Limits
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 11-15-2005, 11:16 AM
BoogerFace BoogerFace is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Outside Boston
Posts: 36
Default Re: QJs coordinated board - too passive or ok?


*grunching*

Fold on the flop? The pot is small and your probably behind to any A, K with only 4 clean outs. (3 tens and the Qh)

Turn as played is fine.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 11-15-2005, 11:47 AM
WalkAmongUs WalkAmongUs is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 16
Default Re: QJs coordinated board - too passive or ok?

[ QUOTE ]
I don't know about .10/.20, but this is 7 handed. If there are already some limpers in the hand, then a limp is ok. But being the first one in, I open with QJs. It plays well multi way, so if everyone calls, no big deal, but if we can get a few folds, even better.

[/ QUOTE ]

Do you open-raise QJs from MP1 at a full 10 handed game? I'm just wondering because I was thinking about tinkering with raising medium suited hands from an earlier position than I normally do. Usually with something like QJs or KJs, I'll open-raise no earlier than MP3.

I play 2/4 currently. I've also logged about 2,000 hands at 3/6. 3/6 will mess with you. I see 15/9/2 players raising with A7 offsuit from MP1. Blind stealing is taken to a new level there.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 11-15-2005, 12:21 PM
car ramrod car ramrod is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 17
Default Re: QJs coordinated board - too passive or ok?

[ QUOTE ]
Do you open-raise QJs from MP1 at a full 10 handed game? I'm just wondering because I was thinking about tinkering with raising medium suited hands from an earlier position than I normally do. Usually with something like QJs or KJs, I'll open-raise no earlier than MP3.

I play 2/4 currently. I've also logged about 2,000 hands at 3/6. 3/6 will mess with you. I see 15/9/2 players raising with A7 offsuit from MP1. Blind stealing is taken to a new level there.


[/ QUOTE ]

I only play short hand, so I maybe a little aggressive. I probably would not raise QJs from MP1 in a full game. It's ok to do it in certain situations, or just to mix up your play a bit.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 11-15-2005, 12:59 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: QJs coordinated board - too passive or ok?

There's an argument to be made for open-raising 7-handed QJs. Otherwise I think we can just muck it.

We should just fold this flop. Bottom pair, and pot is not paying enough to draw at gutshot, which could be a split pot anyhow.

Nice suckout. [img]/images/graemlins/cool.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 11-15-2005, 01:13 PM
midwestkc midwestkc is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 6
Default Re: QJs coordinated board - too passive or ok?

*grunching*

I'd fold the flop. bottom pair, plus the possibility of someone already having the str8 (meaning you may be drawing to a split, or worse if the flush completes) gives me not much hope of winning the pot outright.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 11-15-2005, 01:52 PM
Hellmouth Hellmouth is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Basement of the science building
Posts: 220
Default Re: QJs coordinated board - too passive or ok?

*Grunching

Too many people at this limit are playing Axo trash. With bottom pair you still only have bottom pair. I'm seeing a cheap turn to improve this hand then probably dumping it.
I dont think that you can be more aggressive here since there is a flush draw and you are way behind JT already.

Greg
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 11-15-2005, 04:46 PM
Pedigree Pedigree is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Virginia
Posts: 35
Default Re: QJs coordinated board - too passive or ok?

Why would you want to fold the flop but think it's fine to check the turn? That seems like just as much of a fold as the flop is...
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 11-15-2005, 04:59 PM
DCWildcat DCWildcat is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 358
Default Re: QJs coordinated board - too passive or ok?

grunch

How aggressive should we be with bottom pair and a gutshot, and really no clean outs? Not very. Fold the flop, hard, and try to fold the turn as well, even though you won't have any more cards, because you hate your hand just that much. If this same advice isn't given above, I'm ending it all.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 11-15-2005, 05:07 PM
jaxUp jaxUp is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: omnipresent
Posts: 1,224
Default Re: QJs coordinated board - too passive or ok?

I am calling the flop. Even if we only give ourselves 4 outs (reasonable, I think), we are getting 7:1. I am winning at least 2 more BB if I hit the turn, and probably more with BB in the middle. Seriously, the flop call isn't that bad. People need to chill.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 11-15-2005, 05:12 PM
BoogerFace BoogerFace is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Outside Boston
Posts: 36
Default Re: QJs coordinated board - too passive or ok?

[ QUOTE ]
Why would you want to fold the flop but think it's fine to check the turn? That seems like just as much of a fold as the flop is...

[/ QUOTE ]

I agree - total brain fart on my part.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:54 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.