50-100 shorthanded AA hand.

[evanski]

Hell get his money in with far less than a 6....

[evanski]

He does quite well at 300/600 limit from what I have seen.

[bleu329]

i'm sorry i misread your post, i thought he was the raiser. Well in that case: he likes to bet pot on most small flops, trying to scare people. I still think he could have anything, and would probably smooth call him here.

[THATWACOKID]

Would he lead with trips/boat? Or is he the type to trap? Since he is over aggressive I would think lead but maybe not...

[RoboRob]

regarding his image, I think it would be dumb if he didn't lead out with those as well

[Rocaix]

[ QUOTE ]
He does quite well at 300/600 limit from what I have seen.

[/ QUOTE ]

Is it Catchoftheday? If it is, then I think raising here is pretty good, even if he reraises all-in you're probably still ahead of most hands he could have here.

[hotdog da 2rd]

i would raise here mainly for a better read. if villain has a 6, he's bound to pop you back and you can go on from there. if villain is on a draw/over-pr, than you don't wanna call him down and let him get away cheap.

[mr. shred]

It would kill me to blow my whole stack slow playing AA. I understand what you are trying to do but you commit yourself to calling it down quite possibly for your whole stack. In a shorthanded game he could be playing small suited or unsuited connectors. If you are playing in that game you know the math and the risk you take. If I am going to play a big pot I want to be raising it not calling it.

[BobboFitos]

[ QUOTE ]
If I am going to play a big pot I want to be raising it not calling it.

[/ QUOTE ]
Why? I think the opposite.

[emil3000]

I agree with you. The general concept of being the aggressor is misapplied here.