Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes Hold'em
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 08-09-2004, 01:04 PM
Rico Suave Rico Suave is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 480
Default Results

On the turn, I was thinking....

Saborion: "His stop 'n go makes me wonder. Either that turn card helped him, in which case he's likely to have made two pair or a straight, or he already had something like two pair." And I really did not want to be 3-bet.

and

Sublime: "but just calling with the best hand sucks."

Well the wuss side won the internal struggle (being down 50bb for the day I am sure contributed to my wussiness) and I called. Check called a river brick (MP3 folds) and UTG+1 turns over J8o and MHIG.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 08-09-2004, 01:26 PM
StellarWind StellarWind is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 704
Default Re: QJo from the button

When I am thinking about folding a nice hand I worry about whether I should call just in case my opponent is a fruitcake. But I'm making a raise/fold decision so I will assume my opponent is a normal person and do what works most often.

This is a very dangerous board. A fruitcake might by playing some idiot game with AT or something. A normal person usually has a straight, jacks-up, or a set for this type of action. [Don't ask me why people play sets this way, but they do. As often as I get sucked in, maybe it's smarter than it seems.]

I think we are usually behind here and will often be 3-bet. Someone observed that we do have outs but this is a two-way street. They undoubtedly have lots of outs when we are ahead. Also what does MP3 have? None of your outs are even remotely solid. Make a straight and you will often split or even lose. Hit your jack and face a boat. Hit your queen and lose to a king, eight, or set.

Call and hope this works out. With no nut outs this is not a good hand.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 08-09-2004, 05:51 PM
Vazh Vazh is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 256
Default Re: QJo from the button

[ QUOTE ]
[Don't ask me why people play sets this way, but they do. As often as I get sucked in, maybe it's smarter than it seems.]

I think we are usually behind here and will often be 3-bet.

[/ QUOTE ]

This is exactly why. I know, because I do it myself sometimes against aggressive opponents. 3-bet baby!
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 08-09-2004, 06:14 PM
47outs 47outs is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 132
Default Re: QJo from the button

I call.

outs
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 08-09-2004, 06:18 PM
47outs 47outs is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 132
Default Re: QJo from the button

[ QUOTE ]
His stop 'n go makes me wonder.

[/ QUOTE ]

The stop'n go is a favorite among fish. In an effort to throw you off, don't be fooled by this amature move.


outs
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 08-09-2004, 07:23 PM
Saborion Saborion is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Åkersberga, Sweden
Posts: 730
Default Re: Results

Well the question was whether to call or raise. If I had a player to act behind me, I'd raise. But in a case like this, being last to act, I'd only call. I'm weak post though, is a raise better against most opponents?
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 08-09-2004, 07:56 PM
pstripling pstripling is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 165
Default Re: QJo from the button

I just call. He could have have KQ or 78. JT, J9, KJ are also possible. If this player will bet & raise draws you will really have no idea where you are at in the hand if he reraises you. If you get 3 bet, then the river is a brick will you fold to a bet. If so, raising opens you up to this type of move from this player.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 08-09-2004, 08:01 PM
Victor Victor is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: cleveland
Posts: 68
Default Re: QJo from the button

Just call here. A raise is too risky as you will surely be 3-bet by a straight and maybe even two pair. Just call here because you want to see the river for cheap. Just call on the river because you want to win the pot and might have the best hand.

That way you put in 1 bet to see your river card rather than 2 or 3 and 2 (total) bets to see showdown (if you dont improve).
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 08-09-2004, 08:50 PM
me454555 me454555 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 566
Default Re: QJo from the button

Let's look at the type of hand UTG+2 might have. 33, 99, TT, AT, A9, 78, JQ, J8 (maybe), JT, J9, AJ. Aside from aside from the set hands or the 78, I don't think he's going to 3 bet you here. Which means more often then not, he'll call you're raise and you can check behind if you miss your strait netting you the same 2 bb's as if you just called down. You also get to make 1 more bet if you do hit you're strait.

On the times you're 3 bet, you won't call the river unless you hit the strait.

You've got plenty of outs that I think are good and you're Q might be a good out too.

J - 2 outs
Q - 1.5 outs (K or 8 beats you so I think its only good 50% of the time)
K - 2 outs (4 outs to a possible split pot)
8 - 4 outs

Thats about 9.5 outs, plenty to raise the turn and make some cash off of it. MP3 is coming along and he's probobly dead money so even if you are 3 bet, its not the end of the world.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 08-09-2004, 11:27 PM
tolbiny tolbiny is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 52
Default Re: QJo from the button

You are absolutly correct- i now completely agree that we betting the river is a must if you raise the turn, get called/get checked to.... though i might check a 7.... dont know if that from reading the results
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:23 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.