Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Other Topics > Sporting Events

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 12-11-2005, 09:33 PM
McGahee McGahee is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 735
Default Re: Do the Colts rest their starters?

[ QUOTE ]
1 week off is very different than 4 weeks off.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yes. Very.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 12-11-2005, 10:10 PM
tech tech is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 74
Default Re: Do the Colts rest their starters?

Gotta go for the undefeated season, especially since I need Edge for my FFL playoffs. [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 12-11-2005, 10:10 PM
Jack of Arcades Jack of Arcades is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: not the gay jack
Posts: 2,275
Default Re: Do the Colts rest their starters?

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Pulling their starters is just dumb, and I think does more to hurt their chances at the Super Bowl this year than not resting them would.

[/ QUOTE ]

If this were the case, bye weeks would not be an advantage.

[/ QUOTE ]

1 week off is very different than 4 weeks off.

[/ QUOTE ]

Is anyone actually advocating not having any of the starters see the field for a whole month?
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 12-11-2005, 10:11 PM
MEbenhoe MEbenhoe is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: La Crosse, WI
Posts: 410
Default Re: Do the Colts rest their starters?

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Pulling their starters is just dumb, and I think does more to hurt their chances at the Super Bowl this year than not resting them would.

[/ QUOTE ]

If this were the case, bye weeks would not be an advantage.

[/ QUOTE ]

1 week off is very different than 4 weeks off.

[/ QUOTE ]

Is anyone actually advocating not having any of the starters see the field for a whole month?

[/ QUOTE ]

yes actually
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 12-11-2005, 10:24 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Do the Colts rest their starters?

Winning a Superbowl is more meaningful than an undefeated season. Any Colts fan would rather have the superbowl than go undefeated in the regular season and lose in the championship game or in the superbowl.

If Edgerrin James or Peyton Manning got hurt in a meaningless game against Arizona, Colts fans would be infuriated.

How about treating these games as if they were preseason games. Let the starters play the entire first quarter or even the entire first half, and then pull them out completely or have them play less. This accomplishes two things: (1) It reduces the risk of injury to a key player, and (2) it keeps the starters from getting rusty.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 12-11-2005, 10:28 PM
Oski Oski is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Los Angeles, California
Posts: 444
Default Re: Do the Colts rest their starters?

[ QUOTE ]
Winning a Superbowl is more meaningful than an undefeated season. Any Colts fan would rather have the superbowl than go undefeated in the regular season and lose in the championship game or in the superbowl.


[/ QUOTE ]

True: but only if the decision is put the the fan after the fact. I can't imagine any Colts fan out there who would advocate NOT going for the undefeated season. Its the nature of being a fan and the nature of the sport.

Any fan wants THEIR team to be "the one" for the ages.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 12-11-2005, 10:33 PM
tech tech is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 74
Default Re: Do the Colts rest their starters?

[ QUOTE ]
If Edgerrin James or Peyton Manning got hurt in a meaningless game against Arizona, Colts fans would be infuriated.

[/ QUOTE ]

If I were a Colts fan, I would be infuriated if the only blemish on an otherwise undefeated season was a loss against Arizona.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 12-11-2005, 10:34 PM
MEbenhoe MEbenhoe is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: La Crosse, WI
Posts: 410
Default Re: Do the Colts rest their starters?

[ QUOTE ]
Winning a Superbowl is more meaningful than an undefeated season. Any Colts fan would rather have the superbowl than go undefeated in the regular season and lose in the championship game or in the superbowl.


[/ QUOTE ]

This idea that not resting their starters would cost them the super bowl is so overrated.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 12-12-2005, 12:15 AM
WLVRYN WLVRYN is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 141
Default Re: Do the Colts rest their starters?

Quick - who won Super Bowl XXIV? Unless you can legitimately stump the Schwab or are a 49'ers fan, then you probably wouldnt remember that the 49'ers won that one in a laugher over Denver. But everyone remembers that the Dolphins were the last team to go undefeated.

You have history in your grasp, you have to try to grab it. Peyton/Edge/Marvin could just as easily get hurt the first play of their first playoff game after sitting out, and they could lose both the record and the SB.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 12-12-2005, 12:16 AM
MCS MCS is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 143
Default Re: Do the Colts rest their starters?

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Winning a Superbowl is more meaningful than an undefeated season. Any Colts fan would rather have the superbowl than go undefeated in the regular season and lose in the championship game or in the superbowl.


[/ QUOTE ]

This idea that not resting their starters would cost them the super bowl is so overrated.

[/ QUOTE ]

The probability of serious injury is also very low. Honestly, no matter what they do, it probably won't matter much.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:07 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.