Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Mid-, High-Stakes Pot- and No-Limit Hold'em
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 11-10-2005, 02:17 PM
The Gift Of Gab The Gift Of Gab is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Berkeley, CA
Posts: 161
Default Re: 50/100 NL hand vs Far

The truth is that nobody ever checkraises with a draw and folds it on the same street. Never.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 11-10-2005, 02:29 PM
ggbman ggbman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 605
Default Re: 50/100 NL hand vs Far

Kane, i think your read that he is a loose caller and doesn't exercise good pot control go against betting this turn here, as he won't fold as often as you like. When he raises, you are put to a tough decision because it costs you your whole to stack to semi-bluff and you will be called a lot. I would rather see a turn check, and if you hit on the river you will have a shot at getting a decent amount of money in.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 11-10-2005, 02:32 PM
AZK AZK is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 48
Default Re: 50/100 NL hand vs Far

[ QUOTE ]
The truth is that nobody ever checkraises with a draw and folds it on the same street. Never.

[/ QUOTE ]

Ding ding.

I don't really see how this is even being debated being that in the first line of OP:

[ QUOTE ]
He has made a few loose calls, and I feel that he is a loose caller.

[/ QUOTE ]

WTF? So why are you even 3betting here?
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 11-10-2005, 02:35 PM
flawless_victory flawless_victory is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 144
Default Re: 50/100 NL hand vs Far

hes a limit plyr.
if he plays NL like most limit plyrs, you just played right inti his hands here.
check the turn the first time and dont compound the mistake by reraising.
he about to call you w/ 89.
ugh.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 11-10-2005, 02:50 PM
fuego527 fuego527 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 8
Default Re: 50/100 NL hand vs Far

[ QUOTE ]
I think your math is wrong Kane.

let
x = % time he folds.
so (1-x) = times he calls
7200 in pot
9200 left in your stack
Assuming 22% equity when called

Then your push is EV neutral when

7200x + (1-x){(.22)(22000) - 9200} = 0

Solving for x you need a fold roughly 38% of time here

[/ QUOTE ]

oh right, kane's math acted like he was winning the money he pushed in with, and since that push is the action in question, it doesn't count
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 11-10-2005, 02:58 PM
KaneKungFu123 KaneKungFu123 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,026
Default Re: 50/100 NL hand vs Far

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
One problem with this push is he can have a pair + diamond draw now and be priced into calling.

[/ QUOTE ]

Do you think he has the right price to call with a pair/flush draw?

[/ QUOTE ]

this is far out of my expertise, but anyway...

he gets almost 3:1 on his call.
if he has a diamond draw+pair, he has 7 to 14 outs if behind, lets say 10(?) on average. if he is ahead against a semi bluff, he usualy has 29 or 30 good cards in the deck (32 or 33 if the rank of one card matches yours). that means there must be only a chance of about 10% that you are semi bluffing to make the call correct. that means he should definitely call with a pair + diamond draw imo.

[/ QUOTE ]

can you show the math please?
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 11-10-2005, 03:00 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: 50/100 NL hand vs Far

I'm a low stakes tourny player, so please tell me to shut up if I'm being dumb.

Why not check behind on turn? You said he's loose passive, so your FE's pretty low. Granted, you could lose the pot if he's on a draw and either hits or bets the river (I assume you can't call UI on the river, maybe I'm wrong on this), but when he doesn't bet and you're UI, you can check behind and win the pot a fair amount of the time. And, of course, you've got a strong draw and many of the cards that complete your draw may induce a bluff or a sheriffing call out of him on the river.

Given that you didn't check, I don't see what you expect to accomplish by this push. He's getting great odds, the board is draw heavy (so it's pretty easy to put you on a semibluff).

What range did you put him on and which hands is he folding?
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 11-10-2005, 03:01 PM
KaneKungFu123 KaneKungFu123 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,026
Default Re: 50/100 NL hand vs Far

[ QUOTE ]
I think your math is wrong Kane.

let
x = % time he folds.
so (1-x) = times he calls
7200 in pot
9200 left in your stack
Assuming 22% equity when called

Then your push is EV neutral when

7200x + (1-x){(.22)(22000) - 9200} = 0

Solving for x you need a fold roughly 38% of time here

[/ QUOTE ]

Thanks. Something felt wrong there.

My initial guess when this hand happened was that I needed him to fold about 30%. At 38%, I dont like my play anymore.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 11-10-2005, 03:05 PM
KaneKungFu123 KaneKungFu123 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,026
Default Re: 50/100 NL hand vs Far

Results:

He had Q [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] 9 [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] and called.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 11-10-2005, 03:10 PM
KaneKungFu123 KaneKungFu123 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,026
Default Re: 50/100 NL hand vs Far

I never considered he backdoored a flush draw because his raise doesnt leave enough money behind in his stack for me to be afriad of the river, basically he is making it push or fold for me which doesnt make much sense with a draw.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:29 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.