Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Internet Gambling > Internet Bonuses
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 11-04-2005, 04:16 AM
bigredlemon bigredlemon is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 544
Default Re: Blackjack vs. Pontoon

[ QUOTE ]
I just cleared my $90 Intercasino bonus last night (+ $65 in winnings) on Pontoon and I love it.

Pontoon Advantages:

2:1 payout for blackjack (Pontoon)
ability to hit after doubling
5 card trick pays 2:1
Ability to double on 3-4 cards
Ability to double after split
Pontoon after splitting aces pays 2:1

Disadvantages:

No dealer upcard
Must hit to hard 14
Dealer wins ties

I don't have the stats for the % advantage for each of these (Bet Sklansky knows though), but suspect that Pontoon would have a slight advantage over 4 or 6 deck blackjack, probably very close to single deck blackjack w/ favorable Vegas rules (double on any 2 cards). Agree that variance is probably higher because there are more doubling situations.

Blackjack would be preferred for card counters especially if dealt using 4 decks or less w/ good deck penetration, since Pontoon uses 8 decks and I am unsure of penetration.

[/ QUOTE ]

I can confirm that pontoon after slitting aces DOES NOT PAY DOUBLE at intercasino.

I split aces and hit pontoon on both of them. I was quite sad so see the payout.
You also cannot double immediately after a split. You can only double on your 3rd card.
also note that 5 card trick or pontoons both loose to dealer if he hits either.


I have no proof to back this up but i honestly think that the edge in pontoon is much higher for the house than in BJ. I've been playing according to the wiz chart for months and have never made it to even within 40% of the requirement except for once. Or maybe i'm just very unlucky.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 11-04-2005, 06:21 AM
PLOlover PLOlover is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 365
Default Re: Blackjack vs. Pontoon

[ QUOTE ]
Correct me if I'm wrong.

I define EV as EV = Bonus - HA * Wagering Total

higher variance -> busting out more often -> smaller wagering total -> higher EV

It's a small edge but a player edge nonetheless.

[/ QUOTE ]

I see what you mean. And when you bust the wagering requirement is not carried over to the next month, right?
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 11-05-2005, 09:35 AM
Rudbaeck Rudbaeck is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Sweden
Posts: 555
Default Re: Blackjack vs. Pontoon

[ QUOTE ]
I see what you mean. And when you bust the wagering requirement is not carried over to the next month, right?

[/ QUOTE ]

That varies. But the Crypto WRs do carry over.

Minimizing total HA is very, very important when doing bunches of first deposit bonuses at casinos. Read all about treating regular bonuses as stickies for even lower HA over on bonuswhores.com [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] (This also makes it possible to extract value from the cursed 'slots only' bonuses, which individually almost always have an EV of 0. But 'stickifying' them makes for a fair bit of EV.)
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 11-05-2005, 11:55 AM
jman220 jman220 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: No Poker Sept-May
Posts: 822
Default Re: Blackjack vs. Pontoon

[ QUOTE ]
and often find soft 4 card hands that make automatic 5 card hands. That allows you to double before the 5th card and win quadruple,

[/ QUOTE ]

You should be doubling down on a lot more than soft 4 card hands. You should double down on 4 card hands up to and including hard 17, I believe.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 11-06-2005, 11:48 AM
BigF BigF is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 112
Default Re: Blackjack vs. Pontoon

[ QUOTE ]
(This also makes it possible to extract value from the cursed 'slots only' bonuses, which individually almost always have an EV of 0. But 'stickifying' them makes for a fair bit of EV.)

[/ QUOTE ]

I see what you are saying. But if you can squeeze out a fair bit of EV doing a bunch of them, then individually their EV is not 0.

Your misconception will do you no harm in this case. I just want to make things clear.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:04 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.