|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Re: KQ vs twink
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] and i'll probably get slammed for this by the forum, but if this is your read, and it's solid, i am not sure i bet the river, i may check/call it at least half the time. [/ QUOTE ] his read is that the guy is a fish. you deserve to get slammed for suggesting not value betting three of a kind against a fish. [/ QUOTE ] the read is that the guy is chasing a flush more often than not. would you do the same thing if the flop had 2 clubs? edit: i am wrong about check-calling the river. but i still don't 3-bet. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: KQ vs twink
uh yeah i'd bet if the flop had two clubs and the river brought the third, are you serious?
where did you get that he has a flush draw? because he likes to call on the flop to see if he picks up a draw on the turn? well see, i saw through that because i know OP only put that up because in this specific hand, the guy caught a flush draw on the turn and completed it on the river. his "read" was just another way of posting the results, and i ignored the results. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: KQ vs twink
[ QUOTE ]
uh yeah i'd bet if the flop had two clubs and the river brought the third, are you serious? [/ QUOTE ] i am slammed. i asked for it. i was wrong. i see the error of my ways. blah-blah-blah. of course i don't check/fold against a fish, and i do lead the river. but if the flop has two clubs and a third comes i don't 3-bet. |
|
|