Split the NL forums again?

[soah]

Seems there are now six different forums for limit hold'em, while NL has only two, and they are both pretty crowded.

Small NL: .5/1 and lower (and 1/2 live games?)
Mid NL: 1/2 - 3/6
High NL: 5/10 and above

Or should we attempt to subdivide somehow by shorthanded vs full? Full games online seem to exist mostly only at the small stakes and 10/20 at Party, while short games exist at all limits, so perhaps something like:

Small SH NL: .5/1 and lower
Mid SH NL: 1/2 - 3/6
High SH NL: 5/10 and higher
Small-Mid Full NL: 3/6 and lower
High Full NL: 5/10 and higher

Any thoughts?

[fsuplayer]

i think the forum structure is pretty good as is.

I think you should put this in the "forum suggestions" forum

It is located on the sidebar, below OOT.

[captZEEbo1]

I think this wold be pretty good:

Small NL: .5/1 and lower (and 1/2 live games?)
Mid NL: 1/2 - 3/6
High NL: 5/10 and above


The problem with separating shorthanded and full...it doesn't make as much sense for NL, since most posters here play both and oftentimes the situation doesn't even matter too much if it's full or short (I open raised from CO and BB calls....)

[Marlow]

I like the idea. I think there needs to be another division. Your proposal makes sense, too.

After reading these forums for a little while now, I definately get the distinct feeling that what happens at 2/4 and 3/6 does not translate to 5/10 and up.

Also, in response to fsuplayer, there's no reason to move this thread to the "Forum Suggestions" section. It's deader n' dead with only 1 lousy thread.

[soah]

[ QUOTE ]
I think you should put this in the "forum suggestions" forum

It is located on the sidebar, below OOT.

[/ QUOTE ]

I guess that's new too.

I'll just wait for AZK to move this thread instead of posting a second one.

[soah]

[ QUOTE ]
I think this wold be pretty good:

Small NL: .5/1 and lower (and 1/2 live games?)
Mid NL: 1/2 - 3/6
High NL: 5/10 and above


The problem with separating shorthanded and full...it doesn't make as much sense for NL, since most posters here play both and oftentimes the situation doesn't even matter too much if it's full or short (I open raised from CO and BB calls....)

[/ QUOTE ]

I also considered the same thing with regards to sh vs full. But the games do attract different types of players, especially at the smaller stakes where the full ring games are incredibly weak-tight while the 6-max games are filled with maniacs and loose-passives.

[zaphod]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I think this wold be pretty good:

Small NL: .5/1 and lower (and 1/2 live games?)
Mid NL: 1/2 - 3/6
High NL: 5/10 and above


The problem with separating shorthanded and full...it doesn't make as much sense for NL, since most posters here play both and oftentimes the situation doesn't even matter too much if it's full or short (I open raised from CO and BB calls....)

[/ QUOTE ]

I also considered the same thing with regards to sh vs full. But the games do attract different types of players, especially at the smaller stakes where the full ring games are incredibly weak-tight while the 6-max games are filled with maniacs and loose-passives.

[/ QUOTE ]

Excactly! I liked your first proposal.

[greg nice]

[ QUOTE ]

Small NL: .5/1 and lower (and 1/2 live games?)
Mid NL: 1/2 - 3/6
High NL: 5/10 and above


[/ QUOTE ]

should 5/10 be mid or high? i think its close

[punter11235]

I think 2-4 to 5-10 should be midstakes and 10/20+ highstakes