Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes Pot-, No-Limit Hold'em
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-01-2005, 02:46 AM
GrunchCan GrunchCan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Jundland Wastes
Posts: 595
Default Re: This is why I\'m still at NL50...

[ QUOTE ]
instead of raising it to $45, how about making it 12 or somewhere around there.

[/ QUOTE ]

I had both opponents covered; I was putting them all-in. I believe effective stacks were about 12.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-01-2005, 02:52 AM
CobraGoat CobraGoat is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 8
Default Re: This is why I\'m still at NL50...

i didnt realize he was in hijack, i thought this hand was being played in more EP. so limping is ok here though i hate to limp anything but small PPs.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-01-2005, 02:40 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: This is why I\'m still at NL50...

I really don't see how you severely misplayed this hand.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-01-2005, 02:49 AM
Bukem_ Bukem_ is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 240
Default Re: This is why I\'m still at NL50...

"This is why I'm still at NL50..."

Nope. You got other leaks, this is fine.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-01-2005, 02:50 AM
GrunchCan GrunchCan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Jundland Wastes
Posts: 595
Default Re: This is why I\'m still at NL50...

hm, wonder what they are...
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-01-2005, 02:55 AM
Bukem_ Bukem_ is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 240
Default Re: This is why I\'m still at NL50...

[ QUOTE ]
hm, wonder what they are...

[/ QUOTE ]

Dunno, don't worry about hands like these.

But my guess, and this could probably be generalized for most 2p2 ssnl players who can't seem to move up:

1) Giving implied odds to "bad players"

2) Not value betting relentlessly against bad players-using the what hand that I beat can call my river bet argument.

3) Playing their cards instead of position.

4) trying to nut peddle 40 millin tables instead of crushing 2 or 3.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-01-2005, 03:07 AM
GrunchCan GrunchCan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Jundland Wastes
Posts: 595
Default Re: This is why I\'m still at NL50...

Good post. Definitely some stuff to think about.

Well, I guess my post title is misleading. I'm not at NL50 becasue my roll isn't progressing. My roll is actually building pretty fast now. Ever since just before my Vegas trip a couple months ago, I felt like I was starting to really get NL.

Things are falling in to place, but I have frequent hands, like this one, where I was just a little lost as to what my strategy should be. I have to think my way through the hand and try to figure out the things I should be thinking of. Usually these spots come when I'm in a bad relative position.

1) Giving implied odds to "bad players"

That's interesting. Probably something I'm guilty of. I'll have to look for some posts about this.

2) Not value betting relentlessly against bad players-using the what hand that I beat can call my river bet argument.

I am guilty of not being optimal on the river, but I'm getting better becasue it's something I'm focused on.

3) Playing their cards instead of position.

I wouldn't go so far as to say that I'm 'good' when it comes to this, but I am acutely aware of my position all the time.

4) trying to nut peddle 40 millin tables instead of crushing 2 or 3.

That's definitely not me. I 1-table, sometimes 2-table. I know my game deteriorates at 3 tables, and I've never had a desire to get better at it. So I never 3-table.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-01-2005, 08:41 AM
mackthefork mackthefork is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 82
Default Re: This is why I\'m still at NL50...

[ QUOTE ]
2) Not value betting relentlessly against bad players-using the what hand that I beat can call my river bet argument.


[/ QUOTE ]

My number one crime, good post.

Mack
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-01-2005, 06:49 AM
SpaceAce SpaceAce is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,074
Default Re: This is why I\'m still at NL50...

When calling a raise with someone like QJs, I like for the effective stacks (between myself and the raiser, especially) to be deeper than they are here. Otherwise, you played it perfectly.

SpaceAce
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-01-2005, 07:21 AM
mattw mattw is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 12
Default Re: This is why I\'m still at NL50...

PF: i question the almost cold calling a 4xBB raise with Q-Js. there are two cold callers in front of you. you are not ahead at this point.

Flop: you have second pair, 4 to a 2nd nut flush, and a gut shot. and you push!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:34 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.