|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Re: [!@#$%]
[ QUOTE ]
We have five differences of opinion. We need at least a couple people to agree, then I'll change it. [/ QUOTE ] Put me down as a vote for [censored]. Primarily because I like to refer to him by typing just four choice letters. And because !@#$ looks too cartoony. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: [!@#$%]
i think [censored] is the best.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: [!@#$%]
[censored] i can't even [censored] [censored] make [censored] [censored] changes. [censored] well, [censored] [censored] [censored] [censored]
mat |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: [!@#$%]
Either seems fine to me. But usually when something like !@#$% is used to replace a word the number of characters matches the word that is being censored.
That's not the case with [censored], so it has my vote. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: [!@#$%]
I like !@#$% but not [!@#$%]
I like it just 'cause it seems old time commicy, but then I can see why people wouldn't. Or we could just replace all profanity with random text strings like "shimmering egg princess". |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: [!@#$%]
what the [censored] is Cola an author of?
Keep it as [censored]. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: [!@#$%]
[censored] imo.
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: [!@#$%]
[censored] [!@#$%] i like [censored] too.
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: [!@#$%]
test, [censored]
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: [!@#$%]
A is for [censored] admin not author [censored]
|
|
|