Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > 2+2 Communities > Other Other Topics
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

View Poll Results: 10/20 Full
Harder 1 2.70%
Easier 1 2.70%
About the Same 2 5.41%
NA - I don't play this level 33 89.19%
Voters: 37. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 01-25-2005, 12:20 PM
tdarko tdarko is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: watching channel 9
Posts: 824
Default Re: Better Movie?

nobody is saying that just because a movie won an oscar that it is better than one that didnt, just saying that the credentials are there so obviously it is not a steaming pile of [censored] like some might think.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 01-25-2005, 12:23 PM
jakethebake jakethebake is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 9
Default Re: Better Movie?

[ QUOTE ]
nobody is saying that just because a movie won an oscar that it is better than one that didnt, just saying that the credentials are there so obviously it is not a steaming pile of [censored] like some might think.

[/ QUOTE ]
Bad assumption. Give me an hour and I could probably name you 20 steaming piles of [censored] that won Oscars.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 01-25-2005, 12:52 PM
Dr. Strangelove Dr. Strangelove is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 350
Default Re: Better Movie?

I went with Unforgiven and it's not even close. But Tombstone has so many cool lines.

"I'm your Huckleberry"
"I have two guns; one for each of you"
"Why Ike, whatever do you mean? Maybe poker's just not your game. I know! Let's have a spelling contest!"

etc.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 01-25-2005, 01:05 PM
elwoodblues elwoodblues is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Rosemount, MN
Posts: 462
Default Re: Better Movie?

[ QUOTE ]
However, should a western really be Oscar-worthy?


[/ QUOTE ]

That's just dumb. Why shouldn't it be --- especially one as well done as Unforgiven.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 01-25-2005, 01:14 PM
swede123 swede123 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 366
Default Re: Better Movie?

[ QUOTE ]
I'm in the camp that says Unforgiven won the oscar because of Clint Eastwood as sort of an award for his lifetime acheivements. Not to mention 1992 wasn't a very strong year. A Few Good Men should have won.

[/ QUOTE ]

It's not that strange to hear this from Justin. Many of the things which made A Few Good Men so popular (great all-star cast, memorable lines, interesting but not greatly involved story line, almost-over-the-top-acting by a great actor) were also part of the recipe for success for Tombstone. I bet Justin is also a big fan of Armageddon.

Please, don't take this as a knock. I think Tombstone and A Few Good Men were both very entertaining, and I own both. However, I voted Unforgiven because on so many levels it is simply a much better movie.

Unforgiven blows Tombstone out of the water in just about every dimension of movie making you can imagine: storyline, writing, acting, cinematography, lighting, sound, score, etc. etc. etc.

Cheers,

Swede
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 01-25-2005, 01:16 PM
jakethebake jakethebake is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 9
Default Re: Better Movie?

[ QUOTE ]
A Few Good Men should have won.

[/ QUOTE ]

What a piece of crap that was. Ridiculous plot. Poorly researched. Utter shite.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 01-25-2005, 01:19 PM
ToneLoc ToneLoc is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Shoreditch
Posts: 105
Default Re: Better Movie?

Simple indeed:

Tombstone is the only western that made me fall asleep. No interest whatsoever, just a rather empty modern western...

Unforgiven: deep and complex, great movie, massive acting.

It is not close, indeed... NOt really in the same category at all...
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 01-25-2005, 01:26 PM
jakethebake jakethebake is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 9
Default Re: Better Movie?

My biggest problem with Tombstone was that everyone in it dressed like they just came from Sheplers. It could have been made without Jason Priestley too. Other than that it was a great movie.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 01-25-2005, 01:49 PM
Bubbagump Bubbagump is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Massachussetts
Posts: 9
Default Re: Better Movie?

Kilmer made that movie. Without him, it's a mediocre effort at best. Unforgiven is a solid film.

My .02

Bubba
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 01-25-2005, 01:51 PM
jakethebake jakethebake is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 9
Default Re: Better Movie?

[ QUOTE ]
Kilmer made that movie. Without him, it's a mediocre effort at best. Unforgiven is a solid film.

My .02

Bubba

[/ QUOTE ]
Kilmer did make that movie, and I don't even like him. But w/o that final bar shootout scene all Unforgiven is is a "solid" film, nothing more.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:23 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.