Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Tournament Poker > One-table Tournaments

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-21-2004, 12:34 PM
Irieguy Irieguy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 340
Default Lies, damn lies, and statistics

I'm starting to think that keeping stats may be bad for my game.

I've been playing poker for 15 years, and winning for a few without ever keeping track of anything other than winnings I had to claim on my taxes. Then internet poker comes along and it's like a glorious gift from the heavens. These people are bad, bad, bad bad bad, and I finally see the much over-used poker phrase "giving away their money" applied to a group of about 40,000.

I'm cashing out more than I'm buying in and I'm happy. But all the smart people keep talking about their ITM and ROI and EV and I don't see how it matters much, but I read and think a little more and decide I should keep track and see how I do. So, I play 500 SNGs and track my ROI and my ITM and I prove to myself that I'm winning... and now I know how big my johnson is compared with all the other people who claim to have big johnsons.

But here's the problem: I used to have two kinds of poker emotions-
1. Running good (happy), and
2. Running bad (sad).
Now I have 8 poker emotions:
1. Winning at a rate greater than my long term ROI (happy)
2. Winning at exactly my long term ROI (indifferent)
3. Winning at slightly less than my long term ROI (sad)
4. Realizing that I'm negative for 10 tournaments (pissed)
5. Realizing that another OOTM will drop my ITM% below 42% (depressed)
6. Realizing that I've lost 78% of the time with the best of it over the last 57 showdowns (raging hatred)
7. Realizing that I'm setting a personal OOTM record (homocidal)
8. Completing detailed analysis of past 100 SNGs, deciding to stop playing between 1200 and 200pm, tightening up 5 handed, eliminating the suited-connector limp from my early stage play, becoming less aggressive with weak kings short-handed and more aggressive with big Queens, and finally figuring out how to stop leaking when getting check-raised only to get 7 consecutive 4ths and 3 10ths in the next 10 $55 SNGs (suicidal).

Then I read Aleo's post about his statistically improbable super-turbo-horrendo bad spell and realize that most of his mental anguish is being caused by the fact that he knows precisely how improbably his streak is and how long it will take to repair the ITM and ROI% he worked so hard to build over months and months and a thousand SNGs.

Hmm. Maybe a cashier history is the only spreadsheet I need. Maybe hand histories on the replayer is the only part of a result I should review.

Play the right way,
Irieguy
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-21-2004, 02:33 PM
codewarrior codewarrior is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Mentor, OH, USA
Posts: 79
Default This post is gold

Do you see why?

You make some great points, and it is well written.

I may expound more later.

Welcome to the forum.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-22-2004, 01:16 AM
dethgrind dethgrind is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 104
Default Re: Lies, damn lies, and statistics

You are completely right.

I've spent hours and hours wasting my time thinking about risk of ruin and bankroll management, and what a good ROI is, and what my "real" ROI might be given my results. I've wasted hours of my life tinkering with computer simulations. Enough.

There are only two valuable pieces of information I've gotten from all this:
1) I'm playing small stakes. If I go broke, I can easily replace my bankroll.
2) Even if I'm as good as I think I am, I'll probably still have some huge losing streaks.

I guess it was nice to attach some numbers to those two lessons, but that doesn't really matter. Now I really wish I had just spent all that time studying, improving my game, and just playing.

Thank you Aleomagus and Irieguy.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-22-2004, 01:39 AM
NotReady NotReady is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 70
Default Re: Lies, damn lies, and statistics

If you only play for fun, don't keep any records (seriously).

If you're serious about poker, want to move up, play as high as your bankroll will allow, keep all the records you can. If you can't handle what the records say, play for fun.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-22-2004, 01:37 PM
pzhon pzhon is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 66
Default Re: Lies, damn lies, and statistics

If you play for fun, and you don't find statistics fun, don't maintain more than you need for tax purposes.

I enjoy figuring out how much I win. This can help to answer the following questions:

[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] Do I make more from poker than my day job?
[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] Should I move down in limits?
[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] How much do I need to play at a higher limit to determine whether it is worth moving up?
[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] Do I win more in SNGs than ring games?
[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] How much more do I win more when multi-tabling?
[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] How much can I withdraw?
[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] Is it worth it to take advantage of a promotion that takes up time or locks up my bankroll?
[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] Have I improved in the last few months?

In addition, I think many players don't know how good streaks or bad streaks look from up close. Sometimes I don't notice that I have been running abnormally well.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-23-2004, 06:13 AM
Dooner Dooner is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 15
Default Re: Lies, damn lies, and statistics

I totally relate to what you are saying. Then again, in the back of my mind, the old saying "Ignorance is bliss" speaks up. I'm not sure which way to go. Some people may really be helped by stats and others might be hindered by them.

Over the last year, I've started keeping track of my winnings in ring games. I also keep track of how many SnG's I've played in and how I placed (i.e. 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and out of the money). Then I add the total winnings from both together and that is all.

I don't want to know percentages. If I hit a bad streak, I might focus more on trying not to go below a certain percentage than what I need to do to break the streak. I like to use my bad streaks to analyze my game. A tweak here and tug there and usually come back full steam.

But, for some people the stats really help them take a deeper look into their game. So, if the stats aren't helping you, tone down. Don't throw everything out the window, because keeping some stats may help you in the long run. Hope this helps.

[img]/images/graemlins/cool.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-23-2004, 06:31 AM
t_perkin t_perkin is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Iceland - back in England soon!
Posts: 532
Default Re: Lies, damn lies, and statistics

[ QUOTE ]

I like to use my bad streaks to analyze my game. A tweak here and tug there and usually come back full steam.


[/ QUOTE ]

The whole point of a bad streak is that it it not your poor play but the bad run of cards that is causing you to lose. Adjusting your game will not prevent bad streaks.

In fact one reason people look at stats and such like is to help distinguish between bad streaks and bad play.

Tim
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-23-2004, 02:37 PM
Irieguy Irieguy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 340
Default Re: Lies, damn lies, and statistics

Yes, Tim, exactly my point. I'm not disputing the fact that a statistical record of your play is the only thing that can "prove" whether or not you are winning. But once you are a winning player, I don't think statistics such as ITM and ROI are going to be helpful (for me, at least) along the conitinued path towards improvement.

It seems like human nature to start to look for leaks when you're running bad... but I think you need to tread cautiously here. You should be looking for leaks all of the time, and I think the best way to find them is to have somebody else watch a HH on the replayer. If you are running badly (ie, getting unlucky), and you respond by changing your game, then your record keeping may be hurting you.

Here's a question about which I'd be interested to hear some comments:

If you met two players and asked how they were doing, and one said:
"Great, I play all of the time and cashed out for 30K this year, here's my cashier history."
And the other said:
"I played 1000 SNGs, had an ITM rate of 40% and an ROI of 24% at the $100 level... but I think I can get that up to 30% next year if I plug a few leaks."

What would you think about each player? Which player do you think would be happier? I don't know, I'm still using my spreadsheet, just wondering how helpful a tool it actually is.

Play the right way,
Irieguy
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-23-2004, 02:51 PM
ilya ilya is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Party Poker
Posts: 460
Default Re: Lies, damn lies, and statistics

Great post, Irieguy! And by that I mean "I agree." No, but seriously. I do think people spend way too much time thinking about their ROIs and such. On the other hand...it's good to check up on such things once in a long while. I've set up my poker spreadsheet so that it only lets me see my ROI and ITM once a week....works for me.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-23-2004, 02:59 PM
Pubknight Pubknight is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 14
Default Re: Lies, damn lies, and statistics

There is one thing about tracking/statistics/etc that may not be a factor for Irieguy, but is often overlooked.

Almost everyone that plays poker thinks of themselves as a good poker player... but as we all know, that just cannot be true.

It's easy to remember cashing out $1,000 ... but selective memory has us overlook that one may have done 5 different $300 buy ins over the year prior to that cashout.

I guess my point is, while I understand Irieguy's great post about the difference between being happy, and being a stat maniac, without that stat tracking a lot of people will be able to falsely convince themselves they are making money. Or, they aren't making as much moeny as they think they are.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:38 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.