Pocket 77

Agreed; I meant b/f. My mistake ;o

[nomadtla]

I think Bet/fold is a sillier option then c/c personally.

If they just call the turn bet then they will probably just call the river bet. Where as a check might enduce a bluff enough times to make it worth a call. I don't advocate the c/c line either. I see it as C/f >> c/c >>>> B/f

[DCWildcat]

[ QUOTE ]
I think Bet/fold is a sillier option then c/c personally.

If they just call the turn bet then they will probably just call the river bet. Where as a check might enduce a bluff enough times to make it worth a call. I don't advocate the c/c line either. I see it as C/f >> c/c >>>> B/f

[/ QUOTE ]

A call here would be atrocious with our hand and the pot size. At this limit, a villain line of call->fold is far more likely than call->bluff.

This whole situation is still very read dependent, which is why I harped on it in my earlier post.

[nomadtla]

[ QUOTE ]
This whole situation is still very read dependent, which is why I harped on it in my earlier post.

[/ QUOTE ]

agreed. I just think bet/fold is wasting as bet against anyone who will call that turn. If a better but not nut hand is calling that turn then they're calling that river too.

[McGahee]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
This whole situation is still very read dependent, which is why I harped on it in my earlier post.

[/ QUOTE ]

agreed. I just think bet/fold is wasting as bet against anyone who will call that turn. If a better but not nut hand is calling that turn then they're calling that river too.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm glad somebody mentioned this. You're getting called to much and getting put in the same [censored] spot on the river when you B/F.

If you're going to check and are planning on calling, you might as well bet out anyway. You increase your chances of winning the pot, and if he raises you, you know that you're beat, either way you invest one bet. With betting, you increase your winning chances.