|
View Poll Results: pick | |||
scarlett johansson | 159 | 59.33% | |
rachel mcadams | 109 | 40.67% | |
Voters: 268. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Re: MLG: Evolving
[ QUOTE ]
All, Take whatever your answer is and subtract 1. That is much more likely to be accurate than your initial answer. Yugoslav [/ QUOTE ] What's world champion -1? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: MLG: Evolving
Its best to spell it wrld champion. Adds legitimacy to the claim.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: MLG: Evolving
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] All, Take whatever your answer is and subtract 1. That is much more likely to be accurate than your initial answer. Yugoslav [/ QUOTE ] What's world champion -1? [/ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Ok...I don't mind this answer. But, I mean, sometimes you can answer differently depending...like sometimes I'd answer 3, sometimes 6, sometimes 15....but right. Okay, so obviously the answer is wrld champion....ok....and there is only 1....so that means wrld champion - 1...well, right, it would be curtains - 1. So, generally I fold this early in answering a question but since SNGPT gives us +.4% EV I don't think you can pass that up so I'd have to say the answer is: Newt_Buggs. [/ QUOTE ] I just asked curtains and that's what popped up in my AIM window, [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img]. Yugoslav |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: MLG: Evolving
this is exactly the reason i use trillian isntead of aim
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: MLG: Evolving
I think I'm a three, but probably are confuzlled from time to time.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: MLG: Evolving
Fair enough. Book me for Newt -3.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: MLG: Evolving
SNGs require no skill, why is this question being asked in this forum? You really dont need to go past 3.5 in party sngs. There is some meta in PS 1ks and whatnot, but that doesnt apply to 99.99% of this forum.
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: MLG: Evolving
[ QUOTE ]
SNGs require no skill [/ QUOTE ] As opposed to the bulk of online MTTs, where a very significant portion of the event is going to be spent in the same huge blinds to average stack regime? You're clearly right that the highest levels don't really apply to SNGs, but I don't think they apply to 99% of the tournament poker that anybody here plays either. Congratulations on the self-importance, though. EDIT: Also, why is everybody in such a hurry to categorize themselves? Does putting yourself in a neatly labeled box really help you conceive of what you should be doing to change how you play/think about poker? |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: MLG: Evolving
[ QUOTE ]
SNGs require no skill, why is this question being asked in this forum? You really dont need to go past 3.5 in party sngs. There is some meta in PS 1ks and whatnot, but that doesnt apply to 99.99% of this forum. [/ QUOTE ] i welcome you and all of your lil friends to come play some step 4 highers with me and jman and see how much skill they take. lock in for an even 50. thats 100k to wager. see how you do, since i mean, you dont have to be anything more than a decent poker player to do well. you should kick our ass. holla |
|
|