Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Tournament Poker > One-table Tournaments
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

View Poll Results: pick
scarlett johansson 159 59.33%
rachel mcadams 109 40.67%
Voters: 268. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-21-2005, 01:13 AM
bones bones is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 56
Default Re: MLG: Evolving

[ QUOTE ]
All,

Take whatever your answer is and subtract 1.

That is much more likely to be accurate than your initial answer.

Yugoslav

[/ QUOTE ]

What's world champion -1?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-21-2005, 01:15 AM
curtains curtains is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 240
Default Re: MLG: Evolving

Its best to spell it wrld champion. Adds legitimacy to the claim.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-21-2005, 01:18 AM
The Yugoslavian The Yugoslavian is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Orange County
Posts: 130
Default Re: MLG: Evolving

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
All,

Take whatever your answer is and subtract 1.

That is much more likely to be accurate than your initial answer.

Yugoslav

[/ QUOTE ]

What's world champion -1?

[/ QUOTE ]

[ QUOTE ]

Ok...I don't mind this answer. But, I mean, sometimes you can answer differently depending...like sometimes I'd answer 3, sometimes 6, sometimes 15....but right. Okay, so obviously the answer is wrld champion....ok....and there is only 1....so that means wrld champion - 1...well, right, it would be curtains - 1. So, generally I fold this early in answering a question but since SNGPT gives us +.4% EV I don't think you can pass that up so I'd have to say the answer is:

Newt_Buggs.


[/ QUOTE ]

I just asked curtains and that's what popped up in my AIM window, [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img].

Yugoslav
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-21-2005, 01:20 AM
runner4life7 runner4life7 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 387
Default Re: MLG: Evolving

this is exactly the reason i use trillian isntead of aim
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-21-2005, 01:24 AM
Melchiades Melchiades is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 18
Default Re: MLG: Evolving

I think I'm a three, but probably are confuzlled from time to time.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-21-2005, 01:30 AM
bones bones is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 56
Default Re: MLG: Evolving

Fair enough. Book me for Newt -3.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-21-2005, 02:00 AM
Roman Roman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 384
Default Re: MLG: Evolving

SNGs require no skill, why is this question being asked in this forum? You really dont need to go past 3.5 in party sngs. There is some meta in PS 1ks and whatnot, but that doesnt apply to 99.99% of this forum.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-21-2005, 01:11 PM
gumpzilla gumpzilla is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,401
Default Re: MLG: Evolving

[ QUOTE ]
SNGs require no skill

[/ QUOTE ]

As opposed to the bulk of online MTTs, where a very significant portion of the event is going to be spent in the same huge blinds to average stack regime? You're clearly right that the highest levels don't really apply to SNGs, but I don't think they apply to 99% of the tournament poker that anybody here plays either. Congratulations on the self-importance, though.

EDIT: Also, why is everybody in such a hurry to categorize themselves? Does putting yourself in a neatly labeled box really help you conceive of what you should be doing to change how you play/think about poker?
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-21-2005, 07:28 PM
raptor517 raptor517 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 7
Default Re: MLG: Evolving

[ QUOTE ]
SNGs require no skill, why is this question being asked in this forum? You really dont need to go past 3.5 in party sngs. There is some meta in PS 1ks and whatnot, but that doesnt apply to 99.99% of this forum.

[/ QUOTE ]

i welcome you and all of your lil friends to come play some step 4 highers with me and jman and see how much skill they take. lock in for an even 50. thats 100k to wager. see how you do, since i mean, you dont have to be anything more than a decent poker player to do well. you should kick our ass. holla
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:23 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.