Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Micro-Limits
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-30-2004, 04:15 PM
John Paul John Paul is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 115
Default 2500 hand check up

Hello,
I have finished my first 2500 hands - below are the stats. Thanks to all the folks who have commented on hands I have posted earlier, what I am mostly hoping for here is to see if any stats seem out of whack as a way to guide me to hands I should be reviewing/posting. Disclaimer - I realize the the sample size is too small to make firm statements about the BB/100

Hands: 2570
VP$IP: 17.55%
VP$SB: 36.33%
Folded to blind steals: both 100%
Attempt to steal blinds: 20%
W$WSF: 29.75%
BB/100: +2.51
W to SD%: 39.25%
Won $ at SD: 46.03%
PF Raise: 6.89%

Aggression Factors:
Flop: 2.26
Turn: 1.85
River 1.69
Total 1.91

Based on some earlier posts, and bisonbison's post on rating players ("Some notes on notes") I realized that I was being too passive postflop and have been posting hands and working on that. As a result my aggression factor is up, I think I am playing better - but it is hard to tell with small samples.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-30-2004, 04:21 PM
btspider btspider is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 39
Default Re: 2500 hand check up

sample size is way too low.. don't think about stats until you hit 10K.

your went to SD is probably running too high and as a result your won at SD is lower than the typical range.

you may also be missing some PFR opportunities, but who knows after so few hands.

read/post/comment on hands.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-30-2004, 04:46 PM
Shillx Shillx is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Frog and Peach Pub, Downtown SLO
Posts: 4,478
Default Re: 2500 hand check up

yea you are exactly right

My WTSD is about 33 and my W$SD is almost 57. It used to be well over 60 until I hit a rough streak. Any idea what the "optimal" # is for both of these stats. I know it is really dependant on your VPIP...

Brad
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-30-2004, 04:52 PM
btspider btspider is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 39
Default Re: 2500 hand check up

30-33 seems common for WTSD
52-58 seems common for won @ SD

outside that range isn't necessarily wrong tho as both are completely effect stats which you have no direct control over.

i think WTSD gets higher as you move up as well.. so 33-35 may be more typical higher up.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-30-2004, 05:14 PM
DMBFan23 DMBFan23 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: I don\'t want a large Farva
Posts: 417
Default Re: 2500 hand check up

the two stats I feel you can comment on at this point are VP$IP and PFR$, although they will not be 100% determined. VP$IP looks good, but you should be raising more preflop. what are your raising standards?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-30-2004, 05:47 PM
John Paul John Paul is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 115
Default Re: 2500 hand check up

Thanks for the comments folks - I will go back and look at the hands I am going to showdown with and post some.

For pre-flop raising - for most of these hands I was just following the SSH chart (for tight games as I have rarely run into a game with 6+ players regularly on the flop). Recently I have started working on this more and am also raising if I am first in from late position or MP3, as long as I have a hand worth calling. I will also start thinking about raising first in from MP2 with some hands that are usually calling hands depending on the exact hand and what I know about the folks who are yet to act.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:56 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.