![]() |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
i'd pot the flop and push after his raise, especially if i have a LAG image. hopefully he didn't flop the straight or TTT.
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
Typical WA/WB situation. [/ QUOTE ] this is not at all a WAWB situation. if we're ahead, we may only be slightly ahead of a flush draw (with a redraw, of course). if we're behind a straight, we still have a 36% chance of boating up. we're only way ahead of one/two pair or lower set and only way behind TTT. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Typical WA/WB situation. [/ QUOTE ] this is not at all a WAWB situation. if we're ahead, we may only be slightly ahead of a flush draw (with a redraw, of course). if we're behind a straight, we still have a 36% chance of boating up. we're only way ahead of one/two pair or lower set and only way behind TTT. [/ QUOTE ] Thank You. WA/WB is the most mis/overused term on these forums. I even see people applying it to river situations. This couldn't be LESS of a WA/WB situation. Here is a text book WA/WB situation. You call a raise with AK and the flop comes K22 rainbow. There is no hand that villain can have that is drawing to greater than 2 outs when behind nor have you drawing to greater than 2 outs when ahead. The idea behind identifying such situations is that large bets and raises are likely -EV in these spots. |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|