|
|
#41
10-24-2005, 05:31 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: HU tournament set...
I'm in. I'd prefer Stars or UB. I think best of 3 or a 1 rebuy is the best way, HU is simply too high variance for a one buyin freezeout to really mean anything. I also like the group of 4 round robin, we have top 2 move into a winners bracket, maybe bottom 2 go into a losers bracket?
|
|
#42
10-24-2005, 05:39 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: HU tournament set...
With respect to sites, I'd definitely prefer a site that doesn't screw up where the blinds go in HU. Having the big blind on the button as you do at Party (if you're HU at a 6-max table for example) sucks hardcore. The only site I'm sure has the correct structure in cash games is UB but there may be others.
|
|
#43
10-24-2005, 05:41 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: HU tournament set...
[ QUOTE ]
With respect to sites, I'd definitely prefer a site that doesn't screw up where the blinds go in HU. Having the big blind on the button as you do at Party (if you're HU at a 6-max table for example) sucks hardcore. The only site I'm sure has the correct structure in cash games is UB but there may be others. [/ QUOTE ] Excellent point. I also happen to have $ at UB so that pushes my vote to UB.
|
|
#44
10-24-2005, 05:46 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: HU tournament set...
I'm in, if it's not too late.
Stars also seems to have the correct button = Small Blind structure, I believe (on the 0.01/0.02 NL 1-on-1 cash tables, as far as I have checked) dave. edit: I vote stars - no UB account for me yet.
|
|
#45
10-24-2005, 05:49 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: HU tournament set...
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] With respect to sites, I'd definitely prefer a site that doesn't screw up where the blinds go in HU. Having the big blind on the button as you do at Party (if you're HU at a 6-max table for example) sucks hardcore. The only site I'm sure has the correct structure in cash games is UB but there may be others. [/ QUOTE ] Excellent point. I also happen to have $ at UB so that pushes my vote to UB. [/ QUOTE ]
|
|
#46
10-24-2005, 05:53 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: HU tournament set...
Actually, does it matter what site we play on? As long as each pair can find a site in common, it shouldn't matter what site people play at (assuming we do it as a cash game and not a tournament-- if its a tournament, finding sites with the exact same blind structure might be tough).
|
|
#47
10-24-2005, 05:56 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: HU tournament set...
No I guess it doesn't matter (as long as it has the correct blind/button structure). But if there needs to be one common denominator, I just don't want it to be Stars because I dont have an acct and I'm a lazy bastard.
|
|
#48
10-24-2005, 06:14 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: HU tournament set...
i dont see why what site any match is played on makes any difference. i have money in neteller so im super flexible. the only thing we need to decide on as a group is the setup of the tourney. i think it could work anyway we play it, but im interested in how others want to this. the options at this time are -single elimination w/1rebuy
best of 3 round robin double elimination if there is no concensus on this i will make an appropriate decision sometime tomarrow before i set it all up... ps- only problem at ub is the fact that they do not have 1on1 .01/.02 tables.
|
|
#50
10-24-2005, 06:19 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: HU tournament set...
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] ps- only problem at ub is the fact that they do not have 1on1 .01/.02 tables. [/ QUOTE ] can you create private tables there? [/ QUOTE ] nope they have heads-up play money tables, but I think you only have a chance of finding an open one in off-peak times
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
