#1
|
|||
|
|||
Playing for first
Low buyin Pokerstars SNG
Hero: 3400 SB: 9000 BB: 1100 Blinds 200/400 Players are both very straightforward. Preflop, I called with the intention to folding to any SB action, but was willing to challenge shorty. Preflop: Hero is dealt QJo (1 spade, 1 club) Hero, limps, SB completes, BB raises to t1100 and is allin, hero calls, SB calls. Flop: (t3300) 9T3 ~ 2 spades SB raises allin, hero calls... Thoughts on all streets appreciated |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Playing for first
Personally, I wouldn't mind taking this PF vs. shortie. I haven't run the numbers, but I'd suspect open-pushing is on the + side.
Depending on your relationship with SB, I find at times a simple raise - large enough to put shortie in will often be met with cooperation from SB. Of course if SB is solid/smart/etc., he could push back with plenty of hands before BB committs himself. For this reason, I think open-pushing is the way to go. But having said that, I think you'd be suprised at SB's willingness to let you mop up. Edit: Given the limp, I think calling SB's push is fine. Despite shortie throwing in the rest of his chips in PF, it's not entirely certain you are even trailing him here on the flop. With SB merely completing PF, you stand to have as many as 14 clean outs, not including your backdoor FD. With the few chips you have remaining, your remaining equity with a fold doesn't provide a much improved chance of finishing 1st regardless - especially if BB takes this down in your absence. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Playing for first
Open pushing is +$EV pretty solidly if there tight to loose. Maniac and it's +0.1%. If you've been quiet recently or they have been folding to raises a lot, I push.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Playing for first
Given the way you played it, ~2.5-1 on the flop with an OESD, backdoor flushdraw, overcard outs that may be good, the chance to get HU with a small chiplead, I'm calling SB. Oh, and I'd push pf.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Playing for first
Preflop I think a push is more standard but I don't hate your line, if you think the SB is a loose caller.
Postflop is clear. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Playing for first
[ QUOTE ]
Open pushing is +$EV pretty solidly if there tight to loose. Maniac and it's +0.1%. If you've been quiet recently or they have been folding to raises a lot, I push. [/ QUOTE ] OK, I appreciate the advice, and I know this stuff. My point of this post is to discuss how I played it. I often change gears ITM. I don't care to pushbot here. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Playing for first
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Open pushing is +$EV pretty solidly if there tight to loose. Maniac and it's +0.1%. If you've been quiet recently or they have been folding to raises a lot, I push. [/ QUOTE ] OK, I appreciate the advice, and I know this stuff. My point of this post is to discuss how I played it. I often change gears ITM. I don't care to pushbot here. [/ QUOTE ] "Edit: Given the limp, I think calling SB's push is fine. Despite shortie throwing in the rest of his chips in PF, it's not entirely certain you are even trailing him here on the flop. With SB merely completing PF, you stand to have as many as 14 clean outs, not including your backdoor FD. With the few chips you have remaining, your remaining equity with a fold doesn't provide a much improved chance of finishing 1st regardless - especially if BB takes this down in your absence." I know these edits get lost in the threads...for your consideration |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Playing for first
[ QUOTE ]
OK, I appreciate the advice, and I know this stuff. My point of this post is to discuss how I played it. I often change gears ITM. I don't care to pushbot here. [/ QUOTE ] Sorry, my post was more towards bluefeet's "haven't ran the numbers" I think calling the push is fine. You have a lot of outs and I'm sure you gain some EV because of a higher percent of the times SB is knocked out when you do in fact call. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Playing for first
Here are my thoughts:
Preflop: If I was the big blind, and biggie had folded, and I was facing an allin from shortie, I would be calling with this hand. On the other hand, if I limp here, bigstack pushes, and shortie folds, this is an easy fold. From an $EV equity standpoint, I don't think I lose anything, in fact, I might even gain (although likely miniscule). Preflop (the way it played out): Once bigstack just completed, I felt good that his hand was not great. Once shortie pushed, I figured shortie had a top 20% hand or so. Pockets, strong aces, two big broadway cards. He wanted to get the most value out of his hand. I called. Bigstack's call to me suggested that his hand was probably in the top 50% or so. I guess I don't see him calling with 47o, but I can see him calling with a lot of suited cards, broadway cards, weak aces, etc. Flop: His flop bet identified to me one of his hole cards. At this point I figured his cards to be JT, QT, or KT. I figured AT was out as he would likely have raised that hand preflop. There's a small chance he has 8T or 7T if they're sooooted. There's also a small chance he has 9x. So now what? There's t3300 in dead chips. If I am correct in assuming shortie now has a small probability in winning, making this call with 11 clean outs, and 3 potentially dirty, gives me about 2.8:1 pot equity and 2 cards to come. 2200 to win 5500 seems good to me. Furthermore, I didn't think my chances of taking first by folding here was any better than this chance right here. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Playing for first
|
|
|