I'm completely miffed at this call by another 2+2er

[imported_machine]

was it me by any chance,sounds familuar?

[Matt R.]

[ QUOTE ]
It seems to me that the new fad around here is that a big stack is not worth protecting but a slightly bigger one is infinitely desireable.

[/ QUOTE ]

Almost. I'd say it's that a slightly big stack is not worth protecting, but a bigger stack is infinitely desireable.

[IMTheWalrus8]

I just wanted to point out that it seems like most of you are misreading this hand. 2+2er is in the BB, so if he loses he has 1730, not 2030, and if he folds he has 2460.

3940 if he calls and wins
2460 if he folds
1730 if he calls and loses

I think this is a fold. IMO there *is* a big difference b/w 2460 and 1730 in this situation, and 37o sucks.


[ QUOTE ]
NL Hold'em $30 Buy-in + $3 Entry Fee
Level:7 Blinds(150/300)

Seat 1 is the button
Total number of players : 4
Seat 1: Sponger ( $2310 )
Seat 5: Anamik ( $1900 )
Seat 6: 2+2er ( $2760 )
Seat 7: rolos13 ( $1030 )

** Dealing down cards **
Dealt to Sponger [ Xd Xs ]
rolos13 is all-In [1030]
Sponger folds.
Anamik folds.
2+2er calls [730].
** Dealing Flop ** [ 6c, Jc, 5d ]
** Dealing Turn ** [ Ac ]
** Dealing River ** [ 7h ]
rolos13 shows [ Kc, Ts ] high card ace.
2+2er shows [ 3s, 7c ] a pair of sevens.
2+2er wins 2210 chips from the main pot with a pair of sevens.
rolos13 finished in fourth place.
rolos13 has left the table.

[/ QUOTE ]

[stupidsucker]

[ QUOTE ]
I just wanted to point out that it seems like most of you are misreading this hand. 2+2er is in the BB, so if he loses he has 1730, not 2030, and if he folds he has 2460.

[/ QUOTE ]

I am well aware of the above statement. I still think its a fine call. My first post was intuitive, my second was based on ET.<font color="white">eastbay's tool</font>

[Matt R.]

Ick... you're right. Didn't realize the the stack size was before posting. I vote fold!

Edit -- I thought it was very close initially, and this sways my decision.