|
|
#1
10-07-2003, 09:51 PM
|
|||
|
|||
put us on hands -- 2+2 table
hutz open raises UTG, folded to lil' in the CO who 3-bets, hutz calls.
flop: 7-8-9 rainbow hutz bets, lil' raises, hutz calls turn: [7-8-9] 6 complete rainbow hutz checks, lil' bets, hutz raises, lil' 3-bets, hutz caps river: [7-8-9-6] 9 hutz bets, lil' raises, hutz 3-bets, lil' says "why not?" and caps Who had what? [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] P.S. If you were a participant or observor in the hand, please hold your comments for awhile so others can play along. Y'all can make fun of us later. [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] 
|
|
#2
10-07-2003, 10:05 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: put us on hands -- 2+2 table
Hutz has JT, classic UTG hand (although it does not make sense to open raise with JT UTG), and 'lil has AT. I hope I'm atleast right about 'lil's hand, which is pretty obvious in my opinion, but as for Hutz, JT makes the most sense.
Hope I'm not way off.
|
|
#9
10-08-2003, 04:36 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: put us on hands -- 2+2 table
If the table was tight-aggressive at the moment, I'd say hutz took it down with quad nines over eights full. You both thought the other guy was hyper-aggressive overpair guy or full of [censored] representing the straight.
If the table had resorted back to the bizzaro 2+2 table full of crazed maniacs somebody either won with AK high or got taken to the cleaners by something like 44.
|
|
#10
10-08-2003, 04:56 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: put us on hands -- 2+2 table
Any poster who uses Superman references is the man. [img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img]
But no, it wasn't a maniacal 2+2 table. Everybody seemed to be on their A-game and it was tight-aggressive to the extreme!
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
