|
|
#21
11-04-2005, 11:40 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Buying Kane\'s Hand History Database
For $1,000 I'd think about it for a while, but probably still end up buying. For $350, I think it's a no-brainer if poker is a serious part of your life (i.e. you count on it as part of your income, as I think a good portion of MHNL posters do).
Kirk 
|
|
#22
11-04-2005, 11:41 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Buying Kane\'s Hand History Database
[ QUOTE ]
My Winrate was 2.96ptbb/100 hands over 200,000 hands For some reason I got the idea that this game might be substantially more profitable than 30/60 limit. I guess not. [/ QUOTE ] What are the 30/60 winrates? I was at 3.6ptbb/100 after 180K hands if you want to use that number instead. edit: if i averaged in my winrate(not dollars won) and hand played at 50/100 NL, id be back up around 3.6ptbb/100.
|
|
#25
11-04-2005, 11:48 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Buying Kane\'s Hand History Database
[ QUOTE ]
KKF any reason you aren't including your 5/10 6 max hands? Would you consider including those? [/ QUOTE ] i deleted them all sadly.
|
|
#26
11-04-2005, 11:51 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Buying Kane\'s Hand History Database
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] My Winrate was 2.96ptbb/100 hands over 200,000 hands For some reason I got the idea that this game might be substantially more profitable than 30/60 limit. I guess not. [/ QUOTE ] What are the 30/60 winrates? I was at 3.6ptbb/100 after 180K hands if you want to use that number instead. edit: if i averaged in my winrate(not dollars won) and hand played at 50/100 NL, id be back up around 3.6ptbb/100. [/ QUOTE ] 2.5ish for a very good player. Probably somewhere around 20-30% more hands per hour per table as well I would guess.
|
|
#28
11-04-2005, 11:54 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Buying Kane\'s Hand History Database
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] My Winrate was 2.96ptbb/100 hands over 200,000 hands For some reason I got the idea that this game might be substantially more profitable than 30/60 limit. I guess not. [/ QUOTE ] What are the 30/60 winrates? I was at 3.6ptbb/100 after 180K hands if you want to use that number instead. edit: if i averaged in my winrate(not dollars won) and hand played at 50/100 NL, id be back up around 3.6ptbb/100. [/ QUOTE ] 2.5ish for a very good player. Probably somewhere around 20-30% more hands per hour per table as well I would guess. [/ QUOTE ] So how many hands are you guys seeing in an hour?
|
|
#29
11-04-2005, 12:17 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Buying Kane\'s Hand History Database
By the way, I'm not screwing with Kane or anything here. I am actually considering this purchase. What would be the best way to view this database? Would I have to load it into a reader or just review each hand in its raw form?
Indy
|
|
#30
11-04-2005, 12:21 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Buying Kane\'s Hand History Database
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Probably somewhere around 20-30% more hands per hour per table as well I would guess. [/ QUOTE ] Are you sure about this? KKF is playing w/ probably an AP of 5-6. [/ QUOTE ] I gotta go in a minute so I don't have to look it up exactly, but ballpark 75ish full 120ish short. In my head was comparing short to short and full to full, but b/c of limited tables, short games aren't available at peak hours, so it's probably significantly less than 20-30% overall. Edit: My AP is around 7.8
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
