|
|
#31
11-16-2005, 05:23 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: To all the names mentioned in this thread
Seriously. We don't need any more [censored]/Evan shenanigans.
|
|
#33
11-16-2005, 05:52 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: To all the names mentioned in this thread
Can you give me an example, Dids? Also, if we can't agree on either Tstone or Jason, is there another person we should consider?
|
|
#34
11-16-2005, 05:56 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: To all the names mentioned in this thread
[ QUOTE ]
I'll throw out three more names for you guys to kick around. bicyclekick and James282 could be great for Higher limits. For a suggestions forum, there is one guy I respect a lot that I think has continually demonstrated sound reasoning -- the kind a mod should have -- and that is Microbob. I'm not sure if any other these guys are interested though. [/ QUOTE ] Also, i would be cool with BK or James282 as higher-limits mods, assuming Dcifrthis agrees. Surf
|
|
#35
11-16-2005, 05:57 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: To all the names mentioned in this thread
[ QUOTE ]
Can you give me an example, Dids? Also, if we can't agree on either Tstone or Jason, is there another person we should consider? [/ QUOTE ] I'm not a limit poster, but I lurk there not too infrequently. So here's my suggestion: QTip?
|
|
#36
11-16-2005, 06:07 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: To all the names mentioned in this thread
[ QUOTE ]
If I had to pick the better mod between jason and TStone it's jason in a landslide [/ QUOTE ] same here. i also think turning moderation of high stakes into an 'in-club' thing would be a bad idea. i would expect bk to impart too much personal/friendship bias. james282 would be a better choice, but i still think it would be best if the forum itself isn't wholly governed by a clique. how about 1800gambler?
|
|
#37
11-16-2005, 06:08 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: To all the names mentioned in this thread
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Can you give me an example, Dids? Also, if we can't agree on either Tstone or Jason, is there another person we should consider? [/ QUOTE ] I'm not a limit poster, but I lurk there not too infrequently. So here's my suggestion: QTip? [/ QUOTE ] He's a good poster, but his focus is mainly the lower end of small stakes (2/4) so I really don't think he makes as much sense as a mid-stakes mod as TStone does who has been primarily focussing on midstakes games.
|
|
#38
11-16-2005, 06:17 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: To all the names mentioned in this thread
[ QUOTE ]
He's a good poster, but his focus is mainly the lower end of small stakes (2/4) so I really don't think he makes as much sense as a mid-stakes mod as TStone does who has been primarily focussing on midstakes games. [/ QUOTE ] My quick check found a 15/30 post by him and I remembered reading a few threads with good analysis by him. What about moving some of the existing mods up and making Jake (the snake) and QTip small stakes mods? Aren't all three of the current mods playing mid stakes?
|
|
#39
11-16-2005, 06:17 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: To all the names mentioned in this thread
Yeah, I was looking into that. QTip came into the micros briefly playing 0.50/1, and then it seemed like he moved to 2/4 and SS within a month. I was sorry to see him go, and I'm surprised to see him still at 2/4. Anyway, we have Entity, Evan, and GoT all currently modding SS. What limits do they play? What about promoting QTip to be a mod of SS, and then bumping 2 of the three current SS mods to Mid Stakes?
|
|
#40
11-16-2005, 06:19 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: To all the names mentioned in this thread
[ QUOTE ]
Can you give me an example, Dids? Also, if we can't agree on either Tstone or Jason, is there another person we should consider? [/ QUOTE ] An example of what? Read jason's posting history. Yeah- he has a stupid beef with dynasty, but beyond that his posts are very good. My issue with TStone is simply that while he's a smart kid, he's very much a kid and doesn't strike me as having the people skills for a mod job. I have a feeling jason wouldn't want the mod job anyway- so it may be pointless debate.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
