Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes Shorthanded

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-16-2005, 03:04 PM
Benman Benman is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 40
Default Defending BB issue

If it's folded to the small blind, an aggressive player, who raises, how does everybody play very small pairs, 22-44 for example? My default has been to fold. If you do decide to play here, call I presume, the default line almost has to be call to the river, doesn't it? You can't be looking for trips only, otherwise the odds aren't there, but you can't just give up on the flop either, because the SB is almost always going to bet. Ideas?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-16-2005, 03:08 PM
POKhER POKhER is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: .50/1 At Stars - LONDON, UK.
Posts: 590
Default Re: Defending BB issue

Depends on the villan, is he 50/30? is he 30/20?

What board do we hit? Is it 36J? or is it KT8?

Theres not a guide to this topic really [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img] unfortunatly lol.

Show us an example, it will get more replys i think.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-16-2005, 03:20 PM
Wynton Wynton is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 18
Default Re: Defending BB issue

Headsup, you do not need trips; low pairs will often win.

Against the "aggressive" player in your example, I definitely will not fold a pair. Indeed, there are very few hands I'd fold in this position against that player. Instead, I would just mix it up between calling and reraising.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-16-2005, 03:25 PM
ejay ejay is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 67
Default Re: Defending BB issue

Against an aggresive player i am never folding and i would prolly 3 bet. After the flop i would have to use my reads and the texture of the flop to see where i stand but against really aggro players i like going to the showdown.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-16-2005, 03:28 PM
Monty Cantsin Monty Cantsin is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 61
Default Re: Defending BB issue

[ QUOTE ]
If it's folded to the small blind, an aggressive player, who raises... My default has been to fold.

[/ QUOTE ]

I believe that it's not uncommon for good players to defend with any 2 cards in this situation. You have a pair.

/mc
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-16-2005, 03:37 PM
aargh57 aargh57 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 12
Default Re: Defending BB issue

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
If it's folded to the small blind, an aggressive player, who raises... My default has been to fold.

[/ QUOTE ]

I believe that it's not uncommon for good players to defend with any 2 cards in this situation. You have a pair.

/mc

[/ QUOTE ]

Are you suggesting to defend with any 2 cards in this situation? I can't see how that can be profitable. Even if you know he's stealing how can 72 or 84 be worth a call here as you've got the worst hand going in.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-16-2005, 03:39 PM
imported_The Vibesman imported_The Vibesman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Smokin\' With Bacall
Posts: 895
Default Re: Defending BB issue

Gotta mix it up, but I think the simplest, easiest solution is to just call down the whole way. This keeps you from spewing chips when you are behind and keeps you from getting bluffed out when you are ahead by an aggro opponent, say the type that will re-raise the flop against a perceived steal defense.

Another concept to think about, though, is whether you want your opponent to fold or not, and whether he will fold. Say SB raises, you call w/ 44 and the flop comes A82 rainbow. I think if you know SB will raise plenty of hands without an ace, that a flop raise may be in order. It's possible you could get him to fold a 6-outer here or on the turn. If you are played back at you can safely fold.

There's a lot of other things to think about, I hope this can get you started.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-16-2005, 03:45 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Defending BB issue

[ QUOTE ]
Are you suggesting to defend with any 2 cards in this situation? I can't see how that can be profitable. Even if you know he's stealing how can 72 or 84 be worth a call here as you've got the worst hand going in.

[/ QUOTE ]

Not that I personally advocate defending with 72 here, but you're getting 3:1 on your call here so you don't need the best hand going in. Plus, you'll have position throughout the hand. I would imagine a good player could defend the significant majority of hands here profitably.

My personal limit is about any hand with any ten or higher, lower if they're suited/connected. Is this too tight?
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-16-2005, 03:47 PM
Monty Cantsin Monty Cantsin is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 61
Default Re: Defending BB issue

[ QUOTE ]
Are you suggesting to defend with any 2 cards in this situation? I can't see how that can be profitable. Even if you know he's stealing how can 72 or 84 be worth a call here as you've got the worst hand going in.

[/ QUOTE ]

You're getting 3:1. You have position. If your opponent raises every hand here (and many aggressive opponents will) how can you fold?

Besides, what's wrong with 84? That's a classic unsuited 3-gapper, a very versatile hand.

/mc
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-16-2005, 03:54 PM
aargh57 aargh57 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 12
Default Re: Defending BB issue

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Are you suggesting to defend with any 2 cards in this situation? I can't see how that can be profitable. Even if you know he's stealing how can 72 or 84 be worth a call here as you've got the worst hand going in.

[/ QUOTE ]

You're getting 3:1. You have position. If your opponent raises every hand here (and many aggressive opponents will) how can you fold?

Besides, what's wrong with 84? That's a classic unsuited 3-gapper, a very versatile hand.

/mc

[/ QUOTE ]

I guess maybe you're right and perhaps I should be defending more. When playing in the MLL (micro limit league-now defunct)one was constantly in this position (HU against aggressive players) and I didn't think that it would be profitable to play every hand that was raised to you. Conversely, I never auto raised with uber crap either and would sometimes even limp. Do you consider limping in the SB to be always a bad play?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:58 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.