Increase bankroll, just break even?

[nuclear500]

Would you consider a player (ME) whose bankroll has increased over the last year (and the first year of someones poker playing life) nothing more then a 'break even' player?

"How much has it increased?" Stands right now at 4.4x starting bankroll.

"Cash games or tournaments and Limits/BuyIn - and how many hands?" 15/85ish mix, mostly $5.50 and $11 1-Table SnG's. Probably somewhere between 25-30k hands, I really have not kept crazy stats like some folks.

"Hours played?" - Tops of 10 a week on a REALLY good week. Otherwise probably around 3-5.

Can I provide any more numbers like average ROI, average standing? Not right now, those stats are at home and I just got to work.

I guess the second question would be, when would you begin to make the distinction if my situation does not qualify?

I'm not concerned about my game or my financial situation or anything, just curious what everyone thinks.

[kenberman]

this post is confusing. I do like how you ask yourself questions that you can't answer [img]/images/graemlins/smirk.gif[/img]

short answer: your sample size is probably too small to know if you're a winning player.

read the micro stakes FAQ.