Do I suck at poker?

sammysusar · #1 07-17-2005, 04:37 PM

Somewhere around 33 straigt non money finishes some bad beat etc. avg. field size probably 400 - 500. Before that had a first and a third in pretty short time. I would guess around 45 - 50 career tourneys. Is possible is just variance dont know

MonkeeMan · #2 07-17-2005, 05:28 PM

Were these all televised events?

DinosaurMonster · #3 07-17-2005, 06:59 PM

you can get better responses in the multi-table tournaments forum, but my answer would be yes.

benneh · #4 07-17-2005, 07:01 PM

probably. you should be moneying a little more than that

valenzuela · #5 07-17-2005, 07:40 PM

How can we know by looking at a sample size of 50 MTTs???? Post some hands( not stats) on the MTT forum and theyll help you out.

RicktheRuler · #6 07-17-2005, 07:57 PM

Yep. [img]/images/graemlins/smirk.gif[/img]

TimTimSalabim · #7 07-17-2005, 08:34 PM

Those are not results I would be happy with, but if you really want to get better, there are many avenues for improvement. Try moving down buyin levels and/or study the MTT forum or some books.

jakethebake · #8 07-17-2005, 08:38 PM

if you have to ask...

Rosie5 · #9 07-17-2005, 08:38 PM

[ QUOTE ]
Somewhere around 33 straigt non money finishes

[/ QUOTE ]

depends, were they Sit n goes? [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]

all kidding aside, I think sit n goes would yield smaller variance and you wouldn't be asking this question. Just something to consider

sammysusar · #10 07-17-2005, 10:32 PM

The more i think i about it had they all been at the same buy in level I would probably actually be positive for the 50 tourneys. A couple were tv events but not the ones i did well in unfortunately. Im trying to think about the mistakes ive made and how to play better. I dont think im completely hopeless. I got slightly reckless in my play from a bit of early success i think. Got to get back to bit more conservative style.