|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Is GWB exploiting a state of perpetual war to stifle internal diss
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] How does invoking the name of Hitler invalidate his opinion? I don't get why people say this. [/ QUOTE ] Because it goes to your credibility as a poster when you are constantly using sources that hold extreme views or draw extreme conclusions or make extreme comparisons. And since you should know this will be the reaction of even posters who generally are more likely to agree with your overall views, then that brings up the question of whether your post is sincere or rather intentional trolling. [/ QUOTE ] Why does having opinions that are unpopular or not widely held automatically make you a troll? Or similarly, why does merely citing someone who shares your not-widely-held views make you a troll? I don't understand; is bringing up anything controversial trolling? That's what I seem to be gathering from you and BCPVP. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Is GWB exploiting a state of perpetual war to stifle internal diss
No one is saying that this post constitutes an instant troll label. It's the general tone and content of almost all his posts here that makes it so. This is just further evidence. Even though I don't agree with you on just about everything, I still don't consider you a troll, DVaut.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Is GWB exploiting a state of perpetual war to stifle internal diss
They only attack me because I am such an effective arguer.
They can't dispute my statements so they go after my character. They are used to the faux news dem-punching bags like Colmes. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Is GWB exploiting a state of perpetual war to stifle internal diss
[ QUOTE ]
Why does having opinions that are unpopular or not widely held automatically make you a troll? Or similarly, why does merely citing someone who shares your not-widely-held views make you a troll? I don't understand; is bringing up anything controversial trolling? That's what I seem to be gathering from you and BCPVP. [/ QUOTE ] Obviously in this forum over all others, the line between trolling and merely holding an unpopular opinion is going to be very blurry. As an example, when someone espouses opinions say that are exremely and blatantly racist or uses sources that are, there is not only the possibility that such a poster is just a nutjob, but also more likely that he doesn't really believe those views and is just trying to stir things up in a forum where they are always stirred up anyway. And regarding the OP's post and criticisms of his using sources that compare a president he doesn't like to Hitler, how would you feel if I used sources comparing a leftwing politician to Lenin? Trying to paint a politician and his views as exremely radical one way or the other is usually just a case of political hackjob demagoguery by a person who only cares about persuading others to his views and doesn't care if he uses false sources or misleading conclusions to do so, in addition to perhaps not having a firm grasp of logic in the first place. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Is GWB exploiting a state of perpetual war to stifle internal diss
There you go misrepresenting his words.
He wasnt comparing the president to hitler, did you actually read it? He is comparing his tactics to hitler's tactics, which is completely true. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Is GWB exploiting a state of perpetual war to stifle internal diss
Lists of Bush's donors are widely avaiable.
Bush is pro-ultra wealthy and anti-american on the issues of: Protecting the environment Energy Policy Privatization of Social Security Health Care Illegal immigration and Tax Cuts for the rich |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Is GWB exploiting a state of perpetual war to stifle internal diss
[ QUOTE ]
And regarding the OP's post and criticisms of his using sources that compare a president he doesn't like to Hitler, how would you feel if I used sources comparing a leftwing politician to Lenin? Trying to paint a politician and his views as exremely radical one way or the other is usually just a case of political hackjob demagoguery by a person who only cares about persuading others to his views and doesn't care if he uses false sources or misleading conclusions to do so, in addition to perhaps not having a firm grasp of logic in the first place. [/ QUOTE ] I don't disagree with this in the least; but I don't think political demagoguery is trolling -- it's just par for the course. I don't think you have to look far in the ranks of politicians, media punditry, etc. to find a demagogue or two. We should certainly expect to find some level of demagoguery here. |
|
|