Splitting the PL/NL Forums

[Andrew Fletcher]

Yes. I just hope the mid-level guys will still stick around and teach us small stakes players. If I played 1/2+, I'd want my own forum.

Actually, you might want to keep 1/2 live in the small stakes forum, since I don't think the play is that different from .10/.20 online.

[djoyce003]

If I was splitting i'd probably start at the 2/4 level at the lowest.....1/2 honestly is no different than .5/1 and .25/.5

[DCWGaming]

If anything needs to be split, its NL/PL 6max and NL/PL full.

[Ghazban]

I support a division of:
-- smaller than 1/2 online, 1/2 and smaller live
-- 1/2 to 3/6 (or 5/10, arguments could be made for either) online, 2/5-ish (and 5/5?) live
-- everything higher

Particularly deep and/or tricky hands at any level would probably not be rejected outright if posted in this next higher up forum (eg. a .25/.50 online hand with $300 stacks and a history between the players would be fine in the middle forum, a 2/5 live hand with $2000 stacks and some tough decisions would be fine in the high forum).

[KowCiller]

I agree with Ghaz, Soah and others in the MHNL post regarding the split breakdown.

KoW

[jkkkk]

[ QUOTE ]
I support a division of:
-- smaller than 1/2 online, 1/2 and smaller live
-- 1/2 to 3/6 (or 5/10, arguments could be made for either) online, 2/5-ish (and 5/5?) live
-- everything higher



[/ QUOTE ]

This is the way it should be split imo.

[ajmargarine]

I support a division of:

small -- .50/$1 and below
mid -- 1/2 to 4/8
high -- 5/10 and up

Needs to be done. Sooner the better.

[beavens]

as long as our good midlimit friends slum in the SSNL forums and enlighten us with their knowledge.

[TheWorstPlayer]

I think mid limit players should have to provide proof of winning play before posting in small stakes. Otherwise people will listen to all of their crap advice just based on the fact that they play higher.

[Godfather80]

[ QUOTE ]
If anything needs to be split, its NL/PL 6max and NL/PL full.

[/ QUOTE ]

TRUTH....TRUUUUUUUUUUTH.