|
|
|
|
#1
11-12-2005, 04:42 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 89o
[ QUOTE ]
The flop 3-bet is to clean up some outs correct? [/ QUOTE ] The three bet is much more for value, than any outs were going to clean up with a check raise, after the players behind have already put money in. Sarge[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] 
|
|
#3
11-12-2005, 07:52 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 89o
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] The flop 3-bet is to clean up some outs correct? [/ QUOTE ] The three bet is much more for value, than any outs were going to clean up with a check raise, after the players behind have already put money in. Sarge[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] I play much more 3/6 than 2/4 and realize 2/4 is much looser, but is a 3-bet really for value when we face the ep players with two more cold? Now if they are two big fish that's a different story. The flop lead I like "in this case" because you list the CO as the more aggressive player so we are looking to trap players which worked. However I have done this often in the past and when it's the BB or EP player raising it really sucks to be isolated with a draw so it's always a risky proposition. Generally if the table is pasive I lead but with aggresive tags that will raise in big pots "to clean up outs" etc. I tend to check and hope.
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
