#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Unofficial Deep stacks thread
If they are going to see the river with a flushdraw regardless, charge them. Make sure they make a mistake, don't let them get correct odds.
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Unofficial Deep stacks thread
Yeah, format is awesome, you will still have over 60BBs in 2nd hour [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img].
I have been at very donkey table 1st hour, but haven't managed to take advantage of it (they will probably hang around awhile with these stacks so it is looking good [img]/images/graemlins/cool.gif[/img]). T4,993 at 1st break. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Unofficial Deep stacks thread
If they're going to see the river regardless with a pair + flush draw on the turn I don't want to punt 1k chips and have to pay off a river bet of bigger proportions when I'm wrong but barely make anything when it blanks out. Reverse implied odds, I say.
EDIT: 8580 at the break. Should be over 10k with a few hands, but oh well. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Unofficial Deep stacks thread
Your logic is a bit wrong, IMO. You have to make an oversized bet on turn to give them incorrect implied odds, since you can't fold on a 500 bet on river.
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Unofficial Deep stacks thread
you played that pretty bad
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Unofficial Deep stacks thread
Fine, I'm a donkey.
Just took a big hit when I tried to force the same guy with K6d off a hand. Trying to recover. Not going to bluff that guy anymore. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Unofficial Deep stacks thread
[ QUOTE ]
They're going to be seeing the river with a flush draw regardless , there are so many hands they can have that I like on the turn and I want to get maximum value out of it. In these tournaments, if they want to see showdown they are going to unless I really make a huge bet. Also there's a chance they perceive my bet as weakness and raise me, at which point I cram it in. [/ QUOTE ] That is exactly why you should have bet stronger. I think you mis-played every single street, except the river. So you should only be mad at yourself. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Unofficial Deep stacks thread
Donk sucks out on other player, when asked why he chased he said he was desperate short stack (with 50 BBs [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]).
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Unofficial Deep stacks thread
Meh.
PokerStars Game #2867971719: Tournament #13822822, Hold'em No Limit - Level IV (50/100) - 2005/10/22 - 19:52:56 (ET) Table '13822822 88' Seat #7 is the button Seat 1: SantaChris (4345 in chips) Seat 2: espozuno (3725 in chips) Seat 3: zatoichi139 (2965 in chips) Seat 4: Tutnik (3385 in chips) Seat 5: Hoeks (4165 in chips) Seat 6: 0ld Dave (4180 in chips) Seat 7: NED(C) (3910 in chips) Seat 8: CieloAzor (5510 in chips) Seat 9: Salzano (12815 in chips) CieloAzor: posts small blind 50 Salzano: posts big blind 100 *** HOLE CARDS *** Dealt to CieloAzor [9s 9d] SantaChris: folds espozuno: folds zatoichi139: folds Tutnik: folds Hoeks: calls 100 0ld Dave: folds NED(C): folds CieloAzor: raises 300 to 400 Salzano: folds Hoeks: calls 300 *** FLOP *** [9h 6c Jh] CieloAzor: bets 500 Hoeks: calls 500 *** TURN *** [9h 6c Jh] [Ks] CieloAzor: bets 1400 Hoeks: raises 1865 to 3265 and is all-in CieloAzor: calls 1865 *** RIVER *** [9h 6c Jh Ks] [5d] *** SHOW DOWN *** CieloAzor: shows [9s 9d] (three of a kind, Nines) Hoeks: shows [Tc Qs] (a straight, Nine to King) Hoeks collected 8430 from pot *** SUMMARY *** Total pot 8430 | Rake 0 Board [9h 6c Jh Ks 5d] Seat 1: SantaChris folded before Flop (didn't bet) Seat 2: espozuno folded before Flop (didn't bet) Seat 3: zatoichi139 folded before Flop (didn't bet) Seat 4: Tutnik folded before Flop (didn't bet) Seat 5: Hoeks showed [Tc Qs] and won (8430) with a straight, Nine to King Seat 6: 0ld Dave folded before Flop (didn't bet) Seat 7: NED(C) (button) folded before Flop (didn't bet) Seat 8: CieloAzor (small blind) showed [9s 9d] and lost with three of a kind, Nines Seat 9: Salzano (big blind) folded before Flop |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Unofficial Deep stacks thread
Got the fish to double me a few times, up to 12440.
|
|
|