I'm turning jason into a LAG. The AQo test?

[PokerBob]

IMO this ain't close.

[WillyTrailer]

Welcome to the forum. I'd like to ask you to please stop reading strategy posts and also to never change your mind about this poll [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]


[ QUOTE ]
Muck first and ask questions later.

[/ QUOTE ]

hmmm...my motto is to raise first and think later; it makes my thinking easier.

-WT

[Lost Wages]

So he could actually be a much tighter raiser then?

Lost Wages

[Entity]

[ QUOTE ]
So he could actually be a much tighter raiser then?

Lost Wages

[/ QUOTE ]

Not much tighter, but tighter, yes (in the same way that he could be a looser raiser, but not incredibly loose). I figured he was likely around a 6-10% PFR.

Rob

[ResidentParanoid]

This is just a dumb iso-reraise. 6-10% means he's not doing this much. Fold and move on. You made a mistake. All the posts point to the same thing.

[Entity]

[ QUOTE ]

This is just a dumb iso-reraise. 6-10% means he's not doing this much. Fold and move on. You made a mistake. All the posts point to the same thing.

[/ QUOTE ]

Your post wasn't all that helpful -- but I'm not sure if it was meant to be.

Your equity is very rarely bad in this situation (it takes him being much less than a 6% PFR for your equity to ever be a lot worse than "fair share"), you have position, you have initiative, and you've got a terrible player subsidizing any losses in the form of dead money.

Even if you disagree with a 3-bet here it's very rarely a "dumb" isoraise. AFAIC you've got a pretty strong holding here and the opportunity to use it to your advantage.

Rob

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

This is just a dumb iso-reraise. 6-10% means he's not doing this much. Fold and move on. You made a mistake. All the posts point to the same thing.

[/ QUOTE ]

Your post wasn't all that helpful -- but I'm not sure if it was meant to be.

Your equity is very rarely bad in this situation (it takes him being much less than a 6% PFR for your equity to ever be a lot worse than "fair share"), you have position, you have initiative, and you've got a terrible player subsidizing any losses in the form of dead money.

Even if you disagree with a 3-bet here it's very rarely a "dumb" isoraise. AFAIC you've got a pretty strong holding here and the opportunity to use it to your advantage.

Rob

[/ QUOTE ]

Do you ever cold call here or do you think it's raise or fold?

[Entity]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

This is just a dumb iso-reraise. 6-10% means he's not doing this much. Fold and move on. You made a mistake. All the posts point to the same thing.

[/ QUOTE ]

Your post wasn't all that helpful -- but I'm not sure if it was meant to be.

Your equity is very rarely bad in this situation (it takes him being much less than a 6% PFR for your equity to ever be a lot worse than "fair share"), you have position, you have initiative, and you've got a terrible player subsidizing any losses in the form of dead money.

Even if you disagree with a 3-bet here it's very rarely a "dumb" isoraise. AFAIC you've got a pretty strong holding here and the opportunity to use it to your advantage.

Rob

[/ QUOTE ]

Do you ever cold call here or do you think it's raise or fold?

[/ QUOTE ]

I 3-bet because I think initiative is going to be at least somewhat helpful in folding 6 outers incorrectly on the flop and occasionally folding better hands (i.e. folding 88 on a KT4 board).

Rob

[blumpkin22]

[ QUOTE ]
I 3-bet because I think initiative is going to be at least somewhat helpful in folding 6 outers incorrectly on the flop and occasionally folding better hands (i.e. folding 88 on a KT4 board).

[/ QUOTE ]

Ray "Bones" Barboni: "Let me explain something to you. Momo is dead. Which means everything he had now belongs to Jimmy Cap, including you. Which also means, when I speak, I speak for Jimmy. E.g., from now on, you start showing me the proper f[/i]uckin' respect."
Chili Palmer: ""E.g." means "for example". What I think you want to use is "i.e."."
Ray "Bones" Barboni: "Bulls[/i]hit! That's short for "ergo"."
Chili Palmer: "Ask your man."
Bodyguard: "To the best of my knowledge, "e.g." means "for example"."
Ray "Bones" Barboni: "E.g., i.e., f[/i]uck you! The point is this: When I say "jump", you say "OK", okay?"

[Entity]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I 3-bet because I think initiative is going to be at least somewhat helpful in folding 6 outers incorrectly on the flop and occasionally folding better hands (i.e. folding 88 on a KT4 board).

[/ QUOTE ]

Ray "Bones" Barboni: "Let me explain something to you. Momo is dead. Which means everything he had now belongs to Jimmy Cap, including you. Which also means, when I speak, I speak for Jimmy. E.g., from now on, you start showing me the proper f[/i]uckin' respect."
Chili Palmer: ""E.g." means "for example". What I think you want to use is "i.e."."
Ray "Bones" Barboni: "Bulls[/i]hit! That's short for "ergo"."
Chili Palmer: "Ask your man."
Bodyguard: "To the best of my knowledge, "e.g." means "for example"."
Ray "Bones" Barboni: "E.g., i.e., f[/i]uck you! The point is this: When I say "jump", you say "OK", okay?"

[/ QUOTE ]

Nice. I think either i.e. or e.g. would work here, though (i.d. = id est, "that is to say..."). E.g. probably would have been better, though. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

Rob